Motion and magnetic field inhomogeneity correction techniques for chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI: A contemporary review
Gizeaddis Lamesgin Simegn(Johns Hopkins University), Linda Knutsson(Lund University), Nirbhay N. Yadav(Kennedy Krieger Institute), Peter C.M. van Zijl(Kennedy Krieger Institute), Richard A.E. Edden(Kennedy Krieger Institute), Jinyuan Zhou(Johns Hopkins University), Moritz Zaiß(Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg), Phillip Zhe Sun(Harvard University), Zhongliang Zu(Vanderbilt University), Mina Kim(University College London), Ravinder Reddy(University of Pennsylvania)
Cited by 19
Related Papers
Pros and cons of ultra-high-field MRI/MRS for human application
|Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy|2018|542
MRI detection of glycogen <i>in vivo</i> by using chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging (glycoCEST)
|Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|2007|417
Effects of signal‐to‐noise ratio on the accuracy and reproducibility of diffusion tensor imaging–derived fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and principal eigenvector measurements at 1.5T
|Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging|2007|371
Amide proton transfer imaging of human brain tumors at 3T
|Magnetic Resonance in Medicine|2006|341
Nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) imaging in the human brain at 7T
|NeuroImage|2013|327