Circulating tumour DNA and risk of recurrence in patients with asymptomatic versus symptomatic colorectal cancer

Nadia Øgaard(Aarhus University), Sarah Østrup Jensen(Aarhus University), Mai‐Britt W. Ørntoft(Aarhus University Hospital), Christina Demuth(Aarhus University), Mads H. Rasmussen(Aarhus University), Tenna Vesterman Henriksen(Aarhus University), Jesper Nors(Aarhus University), Amanda Frydendahl(Aarhus University), Iben Lyskjær(Aarhus University), Marijana Nesic(Aarhus University), Christina Therkildsen(Amager Hospital), Jakob Kleif(University of Copenhagen), Mikail Gögenur(Zealand University Hospital Køge), Lars Nannestad Jørgensen(Bispebjerg Hospital), Jesper Vilandt(Nordsjællands Hospital), Jakob Benedict Seidelin(Herlev Hospital), Kåre Anderson Gotschalck(Aarhus University), Claudia Jaensch(Regionshospitalet Herning), Berit Andersen(Aarhus University), Uffe S. Løve(Regionshospitalet Viborg), Ole Thorlacius‐Ussing(Aalborg University), Per Vadgaard Andersen(Odense University Hospital), Thomas Kolbro(Odense University Hospital), Alessio Monti(North Denmark Region), Jeppe Kildsig(Herlev Hospital), Peter Bondeven(Regional Hospital Randers), Nis H. Schlesinger(Bispebjerg Hospital), Lene Hjerrild Iversen(Aarhus University), Morten Rasmussen(Aarhus University), Ismail Gögenür(Zealand University Hospital Køge), Jesper B. Bramsen(Aarhus University), Claus L. Andersen(Aarhus University)
British Journal of Cancer
October 10, 2024
Cited by 10Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple initiatives aim to develop circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) tests for early cancer detection in asymptomatic individuals. The few studies describing ctDNA-testing in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients report lower ctDNA detection in the asymptomatic patients. Here, we explore if asymptomatic patients differ from symptomatic patients e.g. by including a 'low-ctDNA-shedding' and 'less-aggressive' subgroup. METHODS: ctDNA assessment was performed in two independent cohorts of consecutively recruited patients with asymptomatic colorectal cancer (CRC) (Cohort#1: n = 215, Cohort#2: n = 368) and symptomatic CRC (Cohort#1: n = 117, Cohort#2: n = 722). RESULTS: After adjusting for tumour stage and size, the odds of ctDNA detection was significantly lower in asymptomatic patients compared to symptomatic patients (Cohort#1: OR: 0.4, 95%CI: 0.2-0.8, Cohort#2: OR: 0.7, 95%CI: 0.5-0.9). Further, the recurrence risk was lower in asymptomatic patients (Cohort#1: sHR: 0.6, 95%CI: 0.3-1.2, Cohort#2: sHR: 0.6, 95%CI: 0.4-1.0). Notably, ctDNA-negative asymptomatic patients had the lowest recurrence risk compared to the symptomatic patients (Cohort#1: sHR: 0.2, 95%CI: 0.1-0.6, Cohort#2: sHR: 0.3, 95%CI: 0.2-0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that asymptomatic patients are enriched for a 'low-ctDNA-shedding-low-recurrence-risk' subgroup. Such insights are needed to guide ctDNA-based early-detection initiatives and should prompt discussions about de-escalation of therapy and follow-up for ctDNA-negative asymptomatic CRC patients.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis