Capivasertib and fulvestrant for patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: analysis of the subgroup of patients from Japan in the phase 3 CAPItello-291 trial

Eriko Tokunaga(National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center), Hiroji Iwata(Aichi Cancer Center), Mitsuya Itoh(Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital), Tetsuhiko Taira(National Sagamihara Hospital), Tatsuya Toyama(Nagoya City University Hospital), Toshiro Mizuno(Mie University Hospital), Akihiko Osaki(Saitama International Medical Center), Yasuhiro Yanagita(Gunma Prefectural Cardiovascular Center), Seigo Nakamura(Showa University Hospital), Rikiya Nakamura(Chiba Cancer Center), Tomoko Sambe(AstraZeneca (Japan)), T. Ozaki(AstraZeneca (Japan)), Gaia Schiavon(AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)), Sacha J. Howell(The Christie NHS Foundation Trust), Masakazu Toi(Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital)
Breast Cancer
October 8, 2024
Cited by 11Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In CAPItello-291, capivasertib-fulvestrant significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo-fulvestrant in the overall and PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered population with hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-negative) advanced breast cancer. Capivasertib-fulvestrant is approved in Japan for the treatment of patients with one or more tumor biomarker alterations (PIK3CA, AKT1 or PTEN). Here, we report outcomes in the CAPItello-291 subgroup of patients from Japan. METHODS: Adults with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer whose disease had relapsed or progressed during or after treatment with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without previous cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor therapy, were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive capivasertib or placebo, plus fulvestrant. The dual primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS in the overall and PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered population. Safety was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Of 708 patients randomized in CAPItello-291, 78 were from Japan (37 randomized to capivasertib-fulvestrant and 41 to placebo-fulvestrant). In the Japan subgroup, PFS numerically favored the capivasertib-fulvestrant arm (hazard ratio 0.73; 95% CI 0.40-1.28), consistent with the analysis of PFS in the global population. Similarly, in the Japan subgroup of patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors, PFS favored the capivasertib-fulvestrant arm (hazard ratio 0.65; 95% CI 0.29-1.39), consistent with the global population. The adverse event profile of capivasertib-fulvestrant in the Japan subgroup was broadly similar to that in the global population; no new safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSION: Outcomes in the Japan subgroup were broadly similar to those of the global population, supporting the clinical benefit of capivasertib-fulvestrant in treating HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer that has progressed on, or after, an endocrine-based regimen.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis