Cryoablation Without Excision for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: ICE3 Trial 5-Year Follow-Up on Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence

Richard E. Fine(West Cancer Center), Richard C. Gilmore(West Cancer Center), Kenneth R. Tomkovich(CentraState Healthcare Foundation), Jill R. Dietz(University Hospitals of Cleveland), Michael P. Berry(West Cancer Center), Lydia Hernandez, Karen S. Columbus, Susan A. Seedman(Presbyterian Rust Medical Center), Carla S. Fisher(Indiana University Hospital), Linda K. Han(Indiana University Hospital), Eric R. Manahan(Hamilton Medical Center), Randy Hicks(McLaren Regional Medical Center), Rashmi Vaidya(Ironwood Pharmaceuticals (United States)), Lisa D. Curcio, Alexander Sevrukov(Thomas Jefferson University Hospital), Andrew S. Kenler(Bridgeport Hospital), Bret Taback(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Margaret Chen(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Megan E. Miller(University Hospitals of Cleveland), Linsey Gold(Advanced Breast Care), Beth Anglin(Advanced Breast Care), Hussein D. Aoun(The Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute), Rache M. Simmons(Cornell University), Sheldon Feldman(Albert Einstein College of Medicine), Susan K. Boolbol(Mount Sinai Beth Israel)
Annals of Surgical Oncology
September 16, 2024
Cited by 33Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ICE3 trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of cryoablation in women aged ≥60 years with low-risk, early-stage breast cancers, aiming to provide a non-operative treatment option and avoid potential surgical risks. This study presents 5-year follow-up trial results. METHODS: The ICE3 trial is an Institutional Review Board-approved, prospective, multicentered, non-randomized trial including women ≥ 60 years of age with unifocal, ultrasound visible, invasive ductal carcinoma ≤ 1.5 cm in size, histologic grade 1-2, hormone receptor (HR)-positive, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative. The primary study endpoint of 5-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) was evaluated based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: Overall, 194 patients meeting eligibility received successful cryoablation treatment per protocol and were included for analysis. The mean age was 74.9 years (55-94) with a mean tumor size of 7.4 mm transverse (2.8-14.0 mm) and 8.1 mm sagittal (2.5-14.9 mm). With a mean follow-up period of 54.16 months, the IBTR rate at 5 years was 4.3% and breast cancer survival was 96.7%. Of the 124 patients who received endocrine therapy only, the IBTR was 3.7%. No serious device-related adverse events were reported. Minor (88.2%) and moderate (9.6%) adverse events were mild in severity and resolved without residual effects. Quality-of-life score demonstrated statistically significant improvement (p < 0.001) in distress at 6 months as compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cryoablation presents a promising alternative to surgery in selected patients, offering the benefits of a minimally invasive procedure with minimal risks. Further studies are encouraged to confirm cryoablation as a viable alternative to surgical excision low-risk patients.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis