Perioperative Durvalumab with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Operable Bladder Cancer

Thomas Powles(Queen Mary University of London), James W.F. Catto(Queen Mary University of London), Matthew D. Galsky(Queen Mary University of London), Hikmat Al‐Ahmadie(Queen Mary University of London), Joshua J. Meeks(Queen Mary University of London), Hiroyuki Nishiyama(Queen Mary University of London), Toan Quang Vu(Queen Mary University of London), Lorenzo Antonuzzo(Queen Mary University of London), Paweł Wiechno(Queen Mary University of London), Vagif Atduev(Queen Mary University of London), Ariel Galapo Kann(Queen Mary University of London), Tae‐Hwan Kim(Queen Mary University of London), Cristina Suárez(Queen Mary University of London), Chao-Hsiang Chang(Queen Mary University of London), Florian Roghmann(Queen Mary University of London), Mustafa Özgüroğlu(Queen Mary University of London), Bernhard J. Eigl(Queen Mary University of London), Niara Oliveira(Queen Mary University of London), Tomáš Büchler(Queen Mary University of London), Moran Gadot(Queen Mary University of London), Yousef Zakharia(Queen Mary University of London), J. Armstrong(Queen Mary University of London), Ashok Kumar Gupta(Queen Mary University of London), Stephan Hois(Queen Mary University of London), Michiel S. van der Heijden(Queen Mary University of London)
New England Journal of Medicine
September 15, 2024
Cited by 300Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy is the standard treatment for cisplatin-eligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Adding perioperative immunotherapy may improve outcomes. METHODS: In this phase 3, open-label, randomized trial, we assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, cisplatin-eligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer to receive neoadjuvant durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by radical cystectomy and adjuvant durvalumab every 4 weeks for eight cycles (durvalumab group), or to receive neoadjuvant gemcitabine-cisplatin followed by radical cystectomy alone (comparison group). Event-free survival was one of two primary end points. Overall survival was the key secondary end point. RESULTS: In total, 533 patients were assigned to the durvalumab group and 530 to the comparison group. The estimated event-free survival at 24 months was 67.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63.6 to 71.7) in the durvalumab group and 59.8% (95% CI, 55.4 to 64.0) in the comparison group (hazard ratio for progression, recurrence, not undergoing radical cystectomy, or death from any cause, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.82; P<0.001 by stratified log-rank test). The estimated overall survival at 24 months was 82.2% (95% CI, 78.7 to 85.2) in the durvalumab group and 75.2% (95% CI, 71.3 to 78.8) in the comparison group (hazard ratio for death, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.93; P = 0.01 by stratified log-rank test). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 in severity occurred in 40.6% of the patients in the durvalumab group and in 40.9% of those in the comparison group; treatment-related adverse events leading to death occurred in 0.6% in each group. Radical cystectomy was performed in 88.0% of the patients in the durvalumab group and in 83.2% of those in the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative durvalumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy led to significant improvements in event-free survival and overall survival as compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. (Funded by AstraZeneca; NIAGARA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03732677; EudraCT number, 2018-001811-59.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis