Cohesin-mediated 3D contacts tune enhancer-promoter regulation

Philine Guckelberger(Broad Institute), Benjamin R. Doughty(Stanford University), Glen Munson(Broad Institute), Suhas S.P. Rao(University of California, San Francisco), Yingxuan Tan(Lucile Packard Children's Hospital), Xiangmeng Shawn Cai(Lucile Packard Children's Hospital), Charles P. Fulco(Broad Institute), Joseph Nasser(Broad Institute), Kristy S. Mualim(Carnegie Institution for Science), Drew T. Bergman(Broad Institute), Judhajeet Ray(Broad Institute), Evelyn Jagoda(Broad Institute), Chad J. Munger(Lucile Packard Children's Hospital), Andreas R. Gschwind(Lucile Packard Children's Hospital), Maya U. Sheth(Lucile Packard Children's Hospital), Anthony S. Tan(Lucile Packard Children's Hospital), Saul Godinez Pulido(Baylor College of Medicine), Namita Mitra(Baylor College of Medicine), David Weisz(Baylor College of Medicine), Muhammad S. Shamim(Baylor College of Medicine), Neva C. Durand(Broad Institute), Ragini Mahajan(Baylor College of Medicine), Ruqayya Khan(Baylor College of Medicine), Lars M. Steinmetz(European Molecular Biology Laboratory), Masato T. Kanemaki(National Institute of Genetics), Eric S. Lander(Broad Institute), Alexander Meissner(Broad Institute), Erez Lieberman Aiden(Baylor College of Medicine), J Engreitz(Broad Institute)
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
July 12, 2024
Cited by 29Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Enhancers are key drivers of gene regulation thought to act via 3D physical interactions with the promoters of their target genes. However, genome-wide depletions of architectural proteins such as cohesin result in only limited changes in gene expression, despite a loss of contact domains and loops. Consequently, the role of cohesin and 3D contacts in enhancer function remains debated. Here, we developed CRISPRi of regulatory elements upon degron operation (CRUDO), a novel approach to measure how changes in contact frequency impact enhancer effects on target genes by perturbing enhancers with CRISPRi and measuring gene expression in the presence or absence of cohesin. We systematically perturbed all 1,039 candidate enhancers near five cohesin-dependent genes and identified 34 enhancer-gene regulatory interactions. Of 26 regulatory interactions with sufficient statistical power to evaluate cohesin dependence, 18 show cohesin-dependent effects. A decrease in enhancer-promoter contact frequency upon removal of cohesin is frequently accompanied by a decrease in the regulatory effect of the enhancer on gene expression, consistent with a contact-based model for enhancer function. However, changes in contact frequency and regulatory effects on gene expression vary as a function of distance, with distal enhancers (e.g., >50Kb) experiencing much larger changes than proximal ones (e.g., <50Kb). Because most enhancers are located close to their target genes, these observations can explain how only a small subset of genes - those with strong distal enhancers - are sensitive to cohesin. Together, our results illuminate how 3D contacts, influenced by both cohesin and genomic distance, tune enhancer effects on gene expression.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis