Privacy preservation for federated learning in health care

Sarthak Pati(Indiana University School of Medicine), Sourav Kumar(Massachusetts General Hospital), A. Varma(Massachusetts General Hospital), Brandon Edwards(Intel (United States)), Charles Lu(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Liangqiong Qu(University of Hong Kong), Justin J. Wang(Stanford University), A. Lakshminarayanan(Agency for Science, Technology and Research), Shih-han Wang(Intel (United States)), Micah Sheller(Intel (United States)), Ken Chang(Stanford University), Praveer Singh(University of Colorado Denver), Daniel L. Rubin(Stanford University), Jayashree Kalpathy–Cramer(University of Colorado Denver), Spyridon Bakas(Neurological Surgery)
Patterns
July 1, 2024
Cited by 137Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) shows potential to improve health care by leveraging data to build models that can inform clinical workflows. However, access to large quantities of diverse data is needed to develop robust generalizable models. Data sharing across institutions is not always feasible due to legal, security, and privacy concerns. Federated learning (FL) allows for multi-institutional training of AI models, obviating data sharing, albeit with different security and privacy concerns. Specifically, insights exchanged during FL can leak information about institutional data. In addition, FL can introduce issues when there is limited trust among the entities performing the compute. With the growing adoption of FL in health care, it is imperative to elucidate the potential risks. We thus summarize privacy-preserving FL literature in this work with special regard to health care. We draw attention to threats and review mitigation approaches. We anticipate this review to become a health-care researcher's guide to security and privacy in FL.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis