Amivantamab plus lazertinib vs osimertinib in first-line <i>EGFR</i>-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with biomarkers of high-risk disease: A secondary analysis from the phase 3 MARIPOSA study.

Enriqueta Felip(Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari), Byoung Chul Cho(Yonsei University), Vanesa Gutiérrez(Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga), Adlinda Alip(University of Malaya), Benjamin Besse(Université Paris-Saclay), Shun Lu(Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Alexander I. Spira(Virginia Cancer Specialists), Nicolas Girard(Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines), Raffaele Califano(University of Manchester), Shirish M. Gadgeel(Henry Ford Health System), James Chih‐Hsin Yang(National Taiwan University Hospital), Naoyuki Nogami(Ehime University Hospital), Koichi Azuma(Kurume University), Joshua C. Curtin(Janssen (United States)), Jiarui Zhang(Janssen (United States)), Anesh Panchal(Janssen (United Kingdom)), Mariah Ennis(Janssen (United States)), Seema Sethi(Janssen (United States)), Joshua Bauml(Janssen (United States)), Se‐Hoon Lee(Samsung Medical Center)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
June 1, 2024
Cited by 17

Abstract

8504 Background: Amivantamab (ami) is an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody with immune cell-directing activity. Lazertinib (laz) is a CNS-penetrant, 3 rd -generation EGFR TKI. In MARIPOSA (NCT04487080), first-line ami+laz provided a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) vs osimertinib (osi) in patients (pts) with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC (HR, 0.70; P&lt; 0.001), including in pts with a history of brain metastases (HR, 0.69; Cho Ann Oncol 2023;34:S1306, LBA14). Pts with TP53co-mutations, detectable circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and baseline brain or liver metastases have poor prognoses. We evaluated outcomes for pts in these high-risk subgroups from MARIPOSA. Methods: MARIPOSA enrolled pts with treatment-naïve, EGFR-mutant (Ex19del or L858R) advanced NSCLC. This analysis included pts randomized to ami+laz (n = 429) or osi (n = 429). Pathogenic alterations were analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) of baseline blood ctDNA with Guardant360 CDx. Ex19del and L858R ctDNA in blood was analyzed at baseline and Cycle (C) 3 Day (D) 1 with Biodesix droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Results: Baseline ctDNA for NGS analysis of pathogenic alterations was available for 636 pts (ami+laz, n = 320; osi, n = 316). Among pts with TP53 co-mutation, mPFS was 18.2 months (mo) for ami+laz vs 12.9 mo for osi (HR, 0.65; P= 0.003). Pts with TP53 wild-type had a trend favoring ami+laz for mPFS (HR, 0.75; P =0.11). In pts with ddPCR-detectable ctDNA at baseline, ami+laz significantly prolonged mPFS vs osi (20.3 vs 14.8 mo; HR, 0.68; P= 0.002). Further, ami+laz significantly improved mPFS vs osi in pts with ctDNA clearance at C3D1 (24.0 vs 16.5 mo; HR, 0.64; P= 0.004) and in pts who did not clear ctDNA (16.5 vs 9.1 mo; HR, 0.48; P= 0.014). For pts with liver metastases at baseline, ami+laz significantly prolonged mPFS vs osi (18.2 vs 11.0 mo; HR, 0.58; P= 0.017), which is consistent with the improved PFS for ami+laz vs osi in pts with a history of brain metastases. Conclusions: Ami+laz demonstrated significantly improved mPFS vs osi in pts with biomarkers of high-risk disease. Given these features can occur in up to 85% of pts, ami+laz represents an important new standard of care for treatment-naïve EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT04487080 . [Table: see text]


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis