Linvoseltamab for Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Naresh Bumma(The Ohio State University), Joshua Richter(Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai), Sundar Jagannath(Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai), Hans C. Lee(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), James E. Hoffman(University of Miami Health System), Attaya Suvannasankha(Indiana University Health), Jeffrey A. Zonder(The Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute), Mansi Shah(Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey), Suzanne Lentzsch(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Rachid Baz(Moffitt Cancer Center), Joseph Maly(Norton Healthcare), Swathi Namburi, Matthew J. Pianko(University of Michigan), Jing Christine Ye(University of Michigan), Ka Lung Wu(Ziekenhuisnetwerk Antwerpen Stuivenberg), Rebecca Silbermann(Oregon Health & Science University), Chang‐Ki Min(The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital), Marie‐Christiane Vekemans(Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc), Markus Munder(Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz), Ja Min Byun(Seoul National University Hospital), Joaquín Martínez‐López, Kaniel Cassady(Regeneron (United States)), Michelle DeVeaux(Regeneron (United States)), Dhruti Chokshi(Regeneron (United States)), Anita Boyapati(Regeneron (United States)), Anasuya Hazra(Regeneron (United States)), George D. Yancopoulos(Regeneron (United States)), L. Andres Sirulnik(Regeneron (United States)), Karen Rodriguez Lorenc(Regeneron (United States)), Glenn S. Kroog(Regeneron (United States)), Yariv Houvras(Regeneron (United States)), Madhav V. Dhodapkar(Emory University)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
June 16, 2024
Cited by 123Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: We present a phase I/II first-in-human trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of 50 mg and 200 mg doses of linvoseltamab, a B-cell maturation antigen × CD3 bispecific antibody in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). METHODS: Phase II eligible patients had RRMM that either progressed on/after ≥three lines of therapy including a proteasome inhibitor (PI), an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), and an anti-CD38 antibody or was triple-class (PI/IMiD/anti-CD38) refractory. Phase II treatment was once a week through week 14 and then once every 2 weeks. Phase II 200 mg patients who achieved a ≥very good partial response by week 24 received linvoseltamab once every 4 weeks. The primary end point in phase II was overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Among the 117 patients treated with 200 mg, the median age was 70 years, 39% had high-risk cytogenetics, and 28% had penta-refractory disease. At a median follow-up of 14.3 months, the ORR was 71%, with 50% achieving ≥complete response (CR). In 104 patients treated with 50 mg at a median follow-up of 7.4 months, the ORR was 48%, with 21% achieving ≥CR. The median duration of response (DOR) for 200 mg patients (n = 83) was 29.4 months (95% CI, 19.2 to not evaluable). Among 200 mg patients, the most common adverse events included cytokine release syndrome (35.0% Gr1, 10.3% Gr2, 0.9% Gr3), neutropenia (0.9% Gr2, 18.8% Gr3, 23.1% Gr4), and anemia (3.4% Gr1, 4.3% Gr2, 30.8% Gr3). Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurred in 7.7% of patients (2.6% each Gr1, Gr2, Gr3). Infections were reported in 74.4% of patients (33.3% Gr3, 2.6% Gr4); infection frequency and severity declined over time. CONCLUSION: Linvoseltamab 200 mg induced deep and durable responses, with a median DOR of 29.4 months, in patients with RRMM with an acceptable safety profile.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis