Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: long-term survival analysis of the DESTINY-Breast03 trial

Javier Cortés(Hospital San Juan de la Cruz), Sara A. Hurvitz(University of Washington), Seock‐Ah Im(Seoul National University Hospital), Hiroji Iwata(Aichi Cancer Center), Giuseppe Curigliano(University of Milan), Sung‐Bae Kim(Ulsan College), Joanne Chiu(University of Hong Kong), Jose L. Pedrini(Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição), Wěi Li(Jilin University), Kan Yonemori(Tokyo National Hospital), Giampaolo Bianchini(Vita-Salute San Raffaele University), Sherene Loi(The University of Melbourne), Giuliano Santos Borges, Xian Wang(Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital), Thomas Bachelot(Centre Léon Bérard), Shunsuke Nakatani(Daiichi-Sankyo (Japan)), Shahid Ashfaque(Daiichi Sankyo (United States)), Zhengkang Liang(Daiichi Sankyo (United States)), Anton Egorov, Erika Hamilton(Sarah Cannon)
Nature Medicine
June 2, 2024
Cited by 121Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) demonstrated significantly improved efficacy over trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in DESTINY-Breast03 (median follow-up, 28 months). We report updated efficacy and safety analyses, including secondary and exploratory efficacy endpoints (median follow-up, 41 months) of DESTINY-Breast03. Patients with advanced HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxane and trastuzumab were randomized to T-DXd (5.4 mg per kg (261 patients)) or T-DM1 (3.6 mg per kg (263 patients)). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review and was previously reported. The key secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Other secondary endpoints included objective response rate, duration of response and PFS (all by investigator assessment) and safety. At data cutoff, 20 November 2023, median PFS by investigator assessment was 29.0 versus 7.2 months (hazard ratio (HR), 0.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.24-0.38), the 36-month PFS rate was 45.7% versus 12.4% and median OS was 52.6 versus 42.7 months (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.94) with T-DXd versus T-DM1, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with the previous analyses. No new instances of grade ≥3 interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis occurred (all grade rate, 16.7% (T-DXd) versus 3.4% (T-DM1)). With longer follow-up, T-DXd continued to demonstrate superior efficacy over T-DM1 with a manageable safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03529110 .


Related Papers