Consumer involvement in the development and dissemination of chronic kidney disease guidelines: a summary of a meaningful and sustainable approach developed by Caring for Australians and New ZealandeRs with kidney Impairment guidelines

Nicole Scholes‐Robertson(The University of Sydney), Chandana Guha(The University of Sydney), Talia Gutman(The University of Sydney), Martin Howell(The University of Sydney), Adela Yip(The University of Sydney), Brydee Cashmore(The University of Sydney), Ieyesha Roberts(Children's Hospital at Westmead), Pamela Lopez‐Vargas(The University of Sydney), Germaine Wong(The University of Sydney), Robert MacGinley(Eastern Health), Anneliese Synnot(La Trobe University), Jonathan C. Craig(Flinders University), Allison Jauré(The University of Sydney), Rathika Krishnasamy(The University of Queensland), David J. Tunnicliffe(The University of Sydney), Rathika Krishnasamy(The University of Queensland), Vincent Lee, Jane Boag, Helen Coolican, Vanessa Cullen, Debbie Fortnum, Hicham I. Cheikh Hassan, Min Jun, Kelly Lambert, Casey Light, Thu Nguyen, Suetonia C. Palmer, Carla Scuderi, Emily See, Andrea K. Viecelli, Rachael Walker
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
March 26, 2024
Cited by 8Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The involvement of consumers (people with lived experience of disease) in guidelines is widely advocated to improve their relevance and uptake. However, the approaches to consumer involvement in guidelines vary and are not well documented. We describe the consumer involvement framework of Caring for Australians and New ZealandeRs with kidney Impairment Guidelines. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We used a descriptive document analysis to collate all relevant policies, documents, e-mails, and presentations on consumer involvement in our organizations. We performed a narrative synthesis of collated data to summarize our evolving consumer involvement approach in guidelines. RESULTS: We involve consumers at all levels of Caring for Australians and New ZealandeRs with kidney Impairment guideline development and dissemination according to their capacity, from conducting consumer workshops to inform the scope of guidelines, to including consumers as members of the guideline Working Groups and overseeing operations and governance as members of the Steering Committee and staff. Our approach has resulted in tangible outcomes including high-priority topics on patient education, psychosocial care, and clinical care pathways, and focusing the literature reviews to assess patient-important outcomes. The ongoing partnership with consumers led to the generation of consumer version guidelines to improve guideline dissemination and translation to support shared decision-making. CONCLUSION: Meaningful consumer involvement can be achieved through a comprehensive approach across the entire lifecycle of guidelines. However, it must be individualized by ensuring that the involvement of consumers is timely and flexible. Future work is needed to assess the impact of consumer involvement in guideline development.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis