First-Line Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric, Gastroesophageal Junction, and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: 3-Year Follow-Up of the Phase III CheckMate 649 Trial

Yelena Y. Janjigian(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Jaffer A. Ajani(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Markus Moehler(Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz), Lin Shen(Peking University), Marcelo Garrido, Carlos Gallardo(Fundación Arturo López Pérez), Lucjan Wyrwicz(Centrum Onkologii), Kensei Yamaguchi(The Cancer Institute Hospital), James M. Cleary(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Elena Elimova(Princess Margaret Cancer Centre), Michalis V. Karamouzis(Laiko General Hospital of Athens), Ricardo Brugés(Instituto Nacional de Cancerología), Tomasz Skoczylas(Medical University of Lublin), Arinilda Campos Bragagnoli(Hospital de Câncer de Barretos), Tianshi Liu(Sun Yat-sen University), Mustapha Tehfé(Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal), Thomas Zander(University Hospital Cologne), Rubén Dario Kowalyszyn, Roberto Pazo-Cid(Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet), Michael Schenker, Kynan Feeny(St John of God Murdoch Hospital), Rui Wang(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Ming Lei(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Clara Chen(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Raheel Nathani(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Kohei Shitara(National Cancer Center Hospital East)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
February 21, 2024
Cited by 210Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. We report 3-year efficacy and safety results from the phase III CheckMate 649 trial. Patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to nivolumab plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy. Primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) in patients whose tumors expressed PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥5. With 36.2-month minimum follow-up, for patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥5, the OS hazard ratio (HR) for nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.81); 21% versus 10% of patients were alive at 36 months, respectively; the PFS HR was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.81); 36-month PFS rates were 13% versus 8%, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) per BICR was 60% (95% CI, 55 to 65) with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus 45% (95% CI, 40 to 50) with chemotherapy; median duration of response was 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.2 to 12.4) versus 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 7.9), respectively. Nivolumab plus chemotherapy also continued to show improvement in OS, PFS, and ORR versus chemotherapy in the overall population. Adding nivolumab to chemotherapy maintained clinically meaningful long-term survival benefit versus chemotherapy alone, with an acceptable safety profile, supporting the continued use of nivolumab plus chemotherapy as standard first-line treatment for advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis