PROcedure-SPECific postoperative pain management guideline for laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Philipp Lirk(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Joy Badaoui(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Marlene Stuempflen(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Mona Hedayat(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Stephan M. Freys(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Girish P. Joshi(Brigham and Women's Hospital), for the PROSPECT group of the European Society for Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA)(Brigham and Women's Hospital)
European Journal of Anaesthesiology
February 1, 2024
Cited by 28

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer diagnosed in women and third most common in men. Laparoscopic resection has become the standard surgical technique worldwide given its notable benefits, mainly the shorter length of stay and less postoperative pain. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current literature on postoperative pain management following laparoscopic colorectal surgery and update previous procedure-specific pain management recommendations. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores and opioid requirements. We also considered study quality, clinical relevance of trial design, and a comprehensive risk-benefit assessment of the analgesic intervention. We performed a literature search to identify randomised controlled studies (RCTs) published before January 2022. Seventy-two studies were included in the present analysis. Through the established PROSPECT process, we recommend basic analgesia (paracetamol for rectal surgery, and paracetamol with either a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or cyclo-oxygenase-2-specific inhibitor for colonic surgery) and wound infiltration as first-line interventions. No consensus could be achieved either for the use of intrathecal morphine or intravenous lidocaine; no recommendation can be made for these interventions. However, intravenous lidocaine may be considered when basic analgesia cannot be provided.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis