Sacituzumab Govitecan in Combination With Pembrolizumab for Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer That Progressed After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: TROPHY-U-01 Cohort 3

Petros Grivas(University of Washington), Damien Pouessel(Institut Claudius Regaud), Chandler H. Park(Norton Healthcare), Philippe Barthélémy(Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg), Manojkumar Bupathi(Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers), Daniel P. Petrylak(Yale University), Neeraj Agarwal(Huntsman Cancer Institute), Sumati Gupta(Huntsman Cancer Institute), Aude Fléchon(Centre Léon Bérard), Chethan Ramamurthy(The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center), Nancy B. Davis(Vanderbilt University), Alejandro Recio‐Boiles(University of Arizona), Cora N. Sternberg(Cornell University), Astha Bhatia(Gilead Sciences (United States)), Cabilia Pichardo(Gilead Sciences (United States)), Mitch Sierecki(Gilead Sciences (United States)), Julia Tonelli(Gilead Sciences (United States)), Huafeng Zhou(Gilead Sciences (United States)), Scott T. Tagawa(Cornell University), Yohann Loriot(Université Paris-Saclay)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
January 23, 2024
Cited by 74Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pembrolizumab is standard therapy for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) who progress after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy; however, only approximately 21% of patients respond. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a trophoblast cell surface antigen-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate with US Food and Drug Administration-accelerated approval to treat patients with locally advanced or mUC who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI). Here, we report the primary analysis of TROPHY-U-01 cohort 3. METHODS: TROPHY-U-01 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03547973) is a multicohort, open-label phase II study. Patients were CPI-naïve and had mUC progression after platinum-based chemotherapy in the metastatic setting or ≤12 months in the (neo)adjuvant setting. Patients received 10 mg/kg of SG once on days 1 and 8 and 200 mg of pembrolizumab once on day 1 of 21-day cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per central review. Secondary end points included clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) per central review, and safety. RESULTS: Cohort 3 included 41 patients (median age 67 years; 83% male; 78% visceral metastases [29% liver]). With a median follow-up of 14.8 months, the ORR was 41% (95% CI, 26.3 to 57.9; 20% complete response rate), CBR was 46% (95% CI, 30.7 to 62.6), median DOR was 11.1 months (95% CI, 4.8 to not estimable [NE]), and median PFS was 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.4 to 10.2). The median overall survival was 12.7 months (range, 10.7-NE). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 61% of patients; most common were neutropenia (37%), leukopenia (20%), and diarrhea (20%). CONCLUSION: SG plus pembrolizumab demonstrated a high response rate with an overall manageable toxicity profile in patients with mUC who progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. No new safety signals were detected. These data support further evaluation of SG plus CPI in mUC.


Related Papers