Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor–Mutated Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Disease Progression on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Final Results of CheckMate 722

Tony Mok(Chinese University of Hong Kong), Kazuhiko Nakagawa(Kindai University), Keunchil Park(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Yuichiro Ohe(Tokyo National Hospital), Nicolas Girard(Institut du Thorax), Hye Ryun Kim(Yonsei University), Yi‐Long Wu(Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Justin F. Gainor(Harvard University), Se‐Hoon Lee(Samsung Medical Center), Chao‐Hua Chiu(Taipei Medical University Hospital), Sang‐We Kim(Ulsan College), Cheng‐Ta Yang(Chang Gung University), Chien Liang Wu(Mackay Memorial Hospital), Lin Wu(Hunan Cancer Hospital), Meng‐Chih Lin(Chang Gung University), Jens Samol(Johns Hopkins University), Kazuya Ichikado(Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital), Mengzhao Wang(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Xiaoqing Zhang(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Judi Sylvester(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Sunney Li(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Ann Forslund(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), James Chih‐Hsin Yang(National Taiwan University Hospital)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
January 22, 2024
Cited by 147Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE The phase III CheckMate 722 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02864251 ) evaluated nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR)–mutated metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after disease progression on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). METHODS Patients with disease progression after first- or second-generation EGFR TKI therapy (without EGFR T790M mutation) or osimertinib (with/without T790M mutation) were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab (360 mg once every 3 weeks) plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy (once every 3 weeks) or platinum-doublet chemotherapy alone (once every 3 weeks) for four cycles. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included 9- and 12-month PFS rates, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR). RESULTS Overall, 294 patients were randomly assigned. At final analysis (median follow-up, 38.1 months), PFS was not significantly improved with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy (median, 5.6 v 5.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.56 to 1.00]; P = .0528), with 9- and 12-month PFS rates of 25.9% versus 19.8%, and 21.2% versus 15.9%, respectively. Post hoc PFS subgroup analyses showed a trend favoring nivolumab plus chemotherapy in patients with tumors harboring sensitizing EGFR mutations (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.97]), one line of previous EGFR TKI (0.72 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.97]), or both (0.64 [95% CI, 0.47 to 0.88]). Median OS was 19.4 months with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus 15.9 months with chemotherapy, while ORR was 31.3% versus 26.7%, and median DOR was 6.7 versus 5.6 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 44.7% and 29.4% of patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone, respectively. CONCLUSION Nivolumab plus chemotherapy did not significantly improve PFS versus chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC previously treated with EGFR TKIs. No new safety signals were identified.


Related Papers