The Importance of Optimal Thermal Ablation Margins in Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 21 Studies

David-Dimitris Chlorogiannis(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Vlasios S. Sotirchos(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Christos Georgiades(Johns Hopkins University), Dimitrios Filippiadis(National and Kapodistrian University of Athens), Ronald S. Arellano(Massachusetts General Hospital), Mithat Gönen(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Gregory C. Makris(St Thomas' Hospital), Tushar Garg(Massachusetts General Hospital), Constantinos T. Sofocleous(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
Cancers
December 12, 2023
Cited by 42Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the US. Thermal ablation (TA) can be a comparable alternative to partial hepatectomy for selected cases when eradication of all visible tumor with an ablative margin of greater than 5 mm is achieved. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to encapsulate the current clinical evidence concerning the optimal TA margin for local cure in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the CENTRAL databases were systematically searched from inception until 1 May 2023, in accordance with the PRISMA Guidelines. Measure of effect included the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model. Results: Overall, 21 studies were included, comprising 2005 participants and 2873 ablated CLMs. TA with margins less than 5 mm were associated with a 3.6 times higher risk for LTP (n = 21 studies, RR: 3.60; 95% CI: 2.58–5.03; p-value < 0.001). When margins less than 5 mm were additionally confirmed by using 3D software, a 5.1 times higher risk for LTP (n = 4 studies, RR: 5.10; 95% CI: 1.45–17.90; p-value < 0.001) was recorded. Moreover, a thermal ablation margin of less than 10 mm but over 5 mm remained significantly associated with 3.64 times higher risk for LTP vs. minimal margin larger than 10 mm (n = 7 studies, RR: 3.64; 95% CI: 1.31–10.10; p-value < 0.001). Conclusions: This meta-analysis solidifies that a minimal ablation margin over 5 mm is the minimum critical endpoint required, whereas a minimal margin of at least 10 mm yields optimal local tumor control after TA of CLMs.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis