Restrictive or Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Myocardial Infarction and Anemia

Jeffrey L. Carson(Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey), Maria M. Brooks(University of Pittsburgh), Paul C. Hébert(University of Ottawa), Shaun G. Goodman(St. Michael's Hospital), Marnie Bertolet(University of Pittsburgh), Simone A. Glynn(Johnson University), Bernard Chaitman(Johnson University), Tabassome Simon(Johnson University), Renato D. Lópes(Duke University), Andrew M. Goldsweig(Baystate Medical Center), Andrew P. DeFilippis(Johnson University), J. Dawn Abbott(Cardiovascular Institute of the South), Brian J. Potter(Johnson University), François Martin Carrier(Johnson University), Sunil V. Rao(Johnson University), Howard A. Cooper(Westchester Medical Center), Shahab Ghafghazi(University of Louisville), Dean Fergusson(Ottawa Hospital), William J. Kostis(Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey), Helaine Noveck(Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey), Sarang Kim(Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey), Meechai Tessalee(Johnson University), Grégory Ducrocq(Inserm), Pedro Gabriel Melo de Barros e Silva(Johnson University), Darrell J. Triulzi(University of Pittsburgh), Caroline Alsweiler(Johnson University), Mark Menegus(Montefiore Medical Center), John Neary(Johnson University), Lynn Uhl(Johnson University), Jordan B. Strom(Johnson University), Christopher B. Fordyce(University of British Columbia), Émile Ferrari(Johnson University), Johanne Silvain(Inserm), Frances O. Wood(Johnson University), Benoit Daneault(Université de Sherbrooke), Tamar S. Polonsky(Johnson University), Manohara Senaratne(Grey Nuns Community Hospital), Étienne Puymirat(Université Paris Cité), Claire Bouleti(Johnson University), Benoît Lattuca(Johnson University), Harvey D. White(Johnson University), Sheryl F. Kelsey(University of Pittsburgh), Philippe Gabríel Steg(Inserm), John H. Alexander(Duke University)
New England Journal of Medicine
November 11, 2023
Cited by 238Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A strategy of administering a transfusion only when the hemoglobin level falls below 7 or 8 g per deciliter has been widely adopted. However, patients with acute myocardial infarction may benefit from a higher hemoglobin level. METHODS: In this phase 3, interventional trial, we randomly assigned patients with myocardial infarction and a hemoglobin level of less than 10 g per deciliter to a restrictive transfusion strategy (hemoglobin cutoff for transfusion, 7 or 8 g per deciliter) or a liberal transfusion strategy (hemoglobin cutoff, <10 g per deciliter). The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction or death at 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 3504 patients were included in the primary analysis. The mean (±SD) number of red-cell units that were transfused was 0.7±1.6 in the restrictive-strategy group and 2.5±2.3 in the liberal-strategy group. The mean hemoglobin level was 1.3 to 1.6 g per deciliter lower in the restrictive-strategy group than in the liberal-strategy group on days 1 to 3 after randomization. A primary-outcome event occurred in 295 of 1749 patients (16.9%) in the restrictive-strategy group and in 255 of 1755 patients (14.5%) in the liberal-strategy group (risk ratio modeled with multiple imputation for incomplete follow-up, 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99 to 1.34; P = 0.07). Death occurred in 9.9% of the patients with the restrictive strategy and in 8.3% of the patients with the liberal strategy (risk ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.47); myocardial infarction occurred in 8.5% and 7.2% of the patients, respectively (risk ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.49). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute myocardial infarction and anemia, a liberal transfusion strategy did not significantly reduce the risk of recurrent myocardial infarction or death at 30 days. However, potential harms of a restrictive transfusion strategy cannot be excluded. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; MINT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02981407.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis