Exploring the health‐related decision‐making experiences of people with chronic kidney disease and their caregivers: A qualitative study

Shena Gazaway(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Orlando M. Gutiérrez(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Rachel Wells(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Tamara Nix‐Parker(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Claretha Lyas(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Shawona C. Daniel(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Katina Lang‐Lindsey(Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University), Tara Bryant(Vivo Biosciences (United States)), Richard Knight(American Association of Kidney Patients), J. Nicholas Dionne‐Odom(University of Alabama at Birmingham)
Health Expectations
November 5, 2023
Cited by 6Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the decision-making experience of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and their caregivers. METHODS: This was a qualitative descriptive study of the decision-making experiences of individuals with stage 3-end-stage CKD and their family caregivers. One-on-one, semistructured interviews were conducted using a guide developed and approved by a community advisory group. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: (1) decisions triggered by declining health and broad in scope, (2) challenges to decision-making and (3) factors influencing decision-making. Participants' experiences with health-related decision-making demonstrated that decisions were triggered when health declined. Yet, decisions that impact disease progression were being made in stage 3. Decision-making was made difficult due to lack of information, complex co-morbidities, and poor resource utilization. However, the structure and nature of the medical appointment, supportive caregivers, and resources served to remove challenges. CONCLUSION: Decision-support interventions must train patients and caregivers to be empowered participants in answer-seeking behaviours upstream of advanced illness. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS: This work was conducted in full collaboration with a community advisory board consisting of patients with CKD, caregivers and clinicians. These members are noted in the acknowledgement section, and those who worked with the team to develop the interview guide, study protocols, and manuscript preparation are included as authors. As part of their role, advisory members met monthly, providing input on recruitment, study progress, inclusion of diverse voices and added relevance to study findings.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis