Sotorasib plus Panitumumab in Refractory Colorectal Cancer with Mutated <i>KRAS</i> G12C

Marwan Fakih(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Lisa Salvatore(Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Taito Esaki(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Dominik Paul Modest(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), D. Páez López-Bravo(Hospital de Sant Pau), Julien Taı̈eb(Université Paris Cité), Michalis V. Karamouzis(National and Kapodistrian University of Athens), Erika Ruíz‐García(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Tae‐Won Kim(Ulsan College), Yasutoshi Kuboki(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Fausto Meriggi(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), David Cunningham(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Kun‐Huei Yeh(National Taiwan University), Emily Chan(Amgen (United States)), Joseph Chao(Amgen (United States)), Yaneth Saportas(Amgen (United States)), Qui Tran(Amgen (United States)), Chiara Cremolini(University of Pisa), Filippo Pietrantonio(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic)
New England Journal of Medicine
October 22, 2023
Cited by 331

Abstract

BACKGROUND: G12C is a mutation that occurs in approximately 3 to 4% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Monotherapy with KRAS G12C inhibitors has yielded only modest efficacy. Combining the KRAS G12C inhibitor sotorasib with panitumumab, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, may be an effective strategy. METHODS: G12C who had not received previous treatment with a KRAS G12C inhibitor to receive sotorasib at a dose of 960 mg once daily plus panitumumab (53 patients), sotorasib at a dose of 240 mg once daily plus panitumumab (53 patients), or the investigator's choice of trifluridine-tipiracil or regorafenib (standard care; 54 patients). The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Key secondary end points were overall survival and objective response. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 7.8 months (range, 0.1 to 13.9), the median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2 to 6.3) and 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.8) in the 960-mg sotorasib-panitumumab and 240-mg sotorasib-panitumumab groups, respectively, as compared with 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 3.9) in the standard-care group. The hazard ratio for disease progression or death in the 960-mg sotorasib-panitumumab group as compared with the standard-care group was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.80; P = 0.006), and the hazard ratio in the 240-mg sotorasib-panitumumab group was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.93; P = 0.03). Overall survival data are maturing. The objective response was 26.4% (95% CI, 15.3 to 40.3), 5.7% (95% CI, 1.2 to 15.7), and 0% (95% CI, 0.0 to 6.6) in the 960-mg sotorasib-panitumumab, 240-mg sotorasib-panitumumab, and standard-care groups, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 35.8%, 30.2%, and 43.1% of patients, respectively. Skin-related toxic effects and hypomagnesemia were the most common adverse events observed with sotorasib-panitumumab. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase 3 trial of a KRAS G12C inhibitor plus an EGFR inhibitor in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer, both doses of sotorasib in combination with panitumumab resulted in longer progression-free survival than standard treatment. Toxic effects were as expected for either agent alone and resulted in few discontinuations of treatment. (Funded by Amgen; CodeBreaK 300 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05198934.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis