Erdafitinib or Chemotherapy in Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Yohann Loriot(Université de Montpellier), Nobuaki Matsubara(Goethe University Frankfurt), Se Hoon Park(Université Paris-Saclay), Robert Huddart(Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust), Earle F. Burgess(Inserm), Nadine Houédé(Institut Gustave Roussy), Séverine Banek(Université de Montpellier), Valentina Guadalupi(Goethe University Frankfurt), Ja Hyeon Ku(Université Paris-Saclay), Begoña P. Valderrama(Inserm), Ben Tran(Institut Gustave Roussy), Spyros Triantos(Inserm), Yin Kean(Université Paris-Saclay), Sydney Akapame(Inserm), Kris Deprince(Janssen (Belgium)), Sutapa Mukhopadhyay(Institut Gustave Roussy), Nicole L. Stone(Goethe University Frankfurt), Arlene O. Siefker‐Radtke(Goethe University Frankfurt)
New England Journal of Medicine
October 21, 2023
Cited by 283

Abstract

Erdafitinib is a pan–fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in adults with susceptible FGFR3/2 alterations who have progression after platinum-containing chemotherapy. The effects of erdafitinib in patients with FGFR-altered metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progression during or after treatment with checkpoint inhibitors (anti–programmed cell death protein 1 [PD-1] or anti–programmed death ligand 1 [PD-L1] agents) are unclear. Download a PDF of the Research Summary. We conducted a global phase 3 trial of erdafitinib as compared with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma with susceptible FGFR3/2 alterations who had progression after one or two previous treatments that included an anti–PD-1 or anti–PD-L1. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive erdafitinib or the investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (docetaxel or vinflunine). The primary end point was overall survival. A total of 266 patients underwent randomization: 136 to the erdafitinib group and 130 to the chemotherapy group. The median follow-up was 15.9 months. The median overall survival was significantly longer with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (12.1 months vs. 7.8 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 0.88; P=0.005). The median progression-free survival was also longer with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (5.6 months vs. 2.7 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.78; P<0.001). The incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was similar in the two groups (45.9% in the erdafitinib group and 46.4% in the chemotherapy group). Treatment-related adverse events that led to death were less common with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (in 0.7% vs. 5.4% of patients). Erdafitinib therapy resulted in significantly longer overall survival than chemotherapy among patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma and FGFR alterations after previous anti–PD-1 or anti–PD-L1 treatment. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; THOR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03390504.) QUICK TAKE VIDEO SUMMARYErdafitinib in Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma 02:20


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis