Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Abiraterone Acetate for Patients Affected by Oligometastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Trial (ARTO)

Giulio Francolini(Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi), Andrea Gaetano Allegra(University of Florence), Beatrice Detti(Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi), Vanessa Di Cataldo(Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi), Saverio Caini(Piedmont Reference Center for Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention), Alessio Bruni(University of Modena and Reggio Emilia), Gianluca Ingrosso(University of Perugia), Rolando Maria D’Angelillo(University of Rome Tor Vergata), A.R. Alitto(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Matteo Augugliaro(Azienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia), Luca Triggiani(University of Brescia), Silvana Parisi(University of Messina), Gaetano Facchini(Ospedale Madonna Delle Grazie), Marco Banini(University of Florence), Gabriele Simontacchi(Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi), Isacco Desideri(University of Florence), Icro Meattini(University of Florence), Richard K. Valicenti(University of California, Davis), Lorenzo Livi(University of Florence), on behalf of the ARTO Working Group members, Giulia Marvaso, Filippo Alongi, Fabio Arcidiacono, Andrea Lancia, Domenico Genovesi, Ciro Franzese, Giorgia Timon, Daniela Greto, Mauro Loi, Marianna Valzano, Pierluigi Bonomo, Monica Mangoni, Carlotta Becherini, A. Tagliagambe, Raffaela Doro, Laura Masi
Journal of Clinical Oncology
September 21, 2023
Cited by 121Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE ARTO (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03449719 ) is a multicenter, phase II randomized clinical trial testing the benefit of adding stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) in patients with oligometastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients were affected by oligometastatic CRPC as defined as three or less nonvisceral metastatic lesions. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either AAP alone (control arm) or AAP with concomitant SBRT to all the sites of disease (experimental arm). Primary end point was the rate of biochemical response (BR), defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease ≥50% from baseline measured at 6 months from treatment start. Complete BR (CBR), defined as PSA < 0.2 ng/mL at 6 months from treatment, and progression-free survival (PFS) were secondary end points. RESULTS One hundred and fifty-seven patients were enrolled between January 2019 and September 2022. BR was detected in 79.6% of patients (92% v 68.3% in the experimental v control arm, respectively), with an odds ratio (OR) of 5.34 (95% CI, 2.05 to 13.88; P = .001) in favor of the experimental arm. CBR was detected in 38.8% of patients (56% v 23.2% in the experimental v control arm, respectively), with an OR of 4.22 (95% CI, 2.12 to 8.38; P < .001). SBRT yielded a significant PFS improvement, with a hazard ratio for progression of 0.35 (95% CI, 0.21 to 0.57; P < .001) in the experimental versus control arm. CONCLUSION The trial reached its primary end point of biochemical control and PFS, suggesting a clinical advantage for SBRT in addition to first-line AAP treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis