Maintenance Therapy With Cetuximab After FOLFIRI Plus Cetuximab for <i>RAS</i> Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Valérie Boige(Inserm), Hélène Blons(Inserm), Éric François(Centre Antoine Lacassagne), Méher Ben Abdelghani, Jean–Marc Phelip(Institute Cancer De La Loire Lucien Neuwirth), Valérie Le Brun-Ly(Hôpital Dupuytren), Laurent Mineur(Institut Sainte Catherine), Marie Pierre Galais(Centre François Baclesse), Anne-Laure Villing, Vincent Hautefeuille(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie), Laurent Miglianico(Centre Hospitalier privé Saint Grégoire), Christelle de la Fouchardière(Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Dominique Genet, Nadia Levasseur, Charles-Briac Levaché(Polyclinique de Franche Comté), Nicolas Penel(Centre Oscar Lambret), Emmanuel Mitry(Institut Paoli-Calmettes), Stéphane Jacquot(Clinique Clémentville), Thomas Aparicio(Université Paris Cité), Emilie Brument(Pôle de Recherche pour l'Organisation et la Diffusion de l'Information Géographique), Sophie Gourgou(Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier), Florence Castan(Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier), Olivier Bouché(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims)
JAMA Network Open
September 18, 2023
Cited by 21Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Importance: The optimal maintenance strategy after induction chemotherapy with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains to be debated. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with single-agent cetuximab after FOLFIRI (leucovorin [folinic acid], fluorouracil, and irinotecan) plus cetuximab induction therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: The TIME (Treatment After Irinotecan-Based Frontline Therapy: Maintenance With Erbitux]) (PRODIGE 28 [Partenariat de Recherche en Oncologie Digestive]-UCGI 27 [UniCancer GastroIntestinal Group]) phase 2 noncomparative, multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted from January 15, 2014, to November 23, 2018, among 139 patients with unresectable RAS wild-type mCRC. The cutoff date for analysis was July 21, 2022. Interventions: After first-line induction therapy with 8 cycles of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab, patients without disease progression were randomized (1:1) to biweekly maintenance with cetuximab or observation. On disease progression, the same induction regimen was recommended for 16 weeks followed by further maintenance with cetuximab or observation until disease progression under the full induction regimen. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the 6-month progression-free rate from randomization. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. An exploratory biomolecular analysis, using next-generation sequencing, investigated the putative prognostic value of the tumor mutation profile. Results: Of 214 patients enrolled (141 men [65.9%]; median age, 67 years [range, 23-85 years]), 139 were randomized to receive cetuximab (n = 67; 45 men [67.2%]; median age, 64 years [range, 34-85 years]) or to be observed (n = 72; 50 men [69.4%]; median age, 68 years [23-85 years]). The 6-month progression-free rate was 38.8% ([26 of 67] 95% CI, 27.1%-51.5%) in the cetuximab group and 5.6% ([4 of 72] 95% CI, 1.5%-13.6%) in the observation group. At a median follow-up of 40.5 months (95% CI, 33.6-47.5 months), median progression-free survival (PFS) from randomization was 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.7-7.4 months) in the cetuximab group and 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.8-2.7 months) in the observation group. Median overall survival (OS) was 24.8 months (95% CI, 18.7-30.4 months) in the cetuximab group and 19.7 months (95% CI, 13.3-24.4 months) in the observation group. In an exploratory multivariate analysis, any tumor-activating mutation in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway genes was associated with shorter PFS from randomization regardless of treatment group (hazard ratio, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.01-2.62]; P = .04). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 treatment-related toxic effect in the cetuximab group during maintenance therapy was rash (8 of 67 [11.9%]). Conclusion and Relevance: The randomized clinical trial did not meet its primary end point but suggests clinically meaningful PFS and OS benefits associated with cetuximab maintenance therapy. However, maintenance cetuximab or treatment breaks after first-line combination FOLFIRI-cetuximab therapy seems inappropriate for patients with MAPK-mutated independently of the side of primary tumor. A more complete assessment of MAPK pathway mutations warrants further investigation to the refine treatment strategy for patients with RAS wild-type mCRC. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02404935.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis