Extracorporeal Life Support in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock

Hölger Thiele(Universität Hamburg), Uwe Zeymer(Universität Hamburg), İbrahim Akın(Universität Hamburg), Michael Behnes(Universität Hamburg), Tienush Rassaf(Universität Hamburg), Amir A. Mahabadi(Universität Hamburg), Ralf Lehmann(Universität Hamburg), Ingo Eitel(Universität Hamburg), Tobias Graf(Universität Hamburg), Tim Seidler(Universität Hamburg), Andreas Schuster(Universität Hamburg), Carsten Skurk(Universität Hamburg), Daniel Duerschmied(Universität Hamburg), Peter Clemmensen(Universität Hamburg), Marcus Hennersdorf(Universität Hamburg), Stephan Fichtlscherer(Universität Hamburg), Ingo Voigt(Universität Hamburg), Melchior Seyfarth(Witten/Herdecke University), Stefan John(Universität Hamburg), Sebastian Ewen(Universität Hamburg), Axel Linke(Universität Hamburg), Eike Tigges(Universität Hamburg), Peter Nordbeck(Universität Hamburg), Leonhard Bruch(Universität Hamburg), Christian Jung(Universität Hamburg), Jutta Franz(Universität Hamburg), Philipp Lauten(Universität Hamburg), Tomaž Goslar(Universität Hamburg), Hans‐Josef Feistritzer(Universität Hamburg), Janine Pöss(Universität Hamburg), Eva Kirchhof(Universität Hamburg), Taoufik Ouarrak(Universität Hamburg), Steffen Schneider(Universität Hamburg), Steffen Desch(Universität Hamburg), Anne Freund(Universität Hamburg)
New England Journal of Medicine
August 26, 2023
Cited by 730Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is increasingly used in the treatment of infarct-related cardiogenic shock despite a lack of evidence regarding its effect on mortality. METHODS: In this multicenter trial, patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock for whom early revascularization was planned were randomly assigned to receive early ECLS plus usual medical treatment (ECLS group) or usual medical treatment alone (control group). The primary outcome was death from any cause at 30 days. Safety outcomes included bleeding, stroke, and peripheral vascular complications warranting interventional or surgical therapy. RESULTS: A total of 420 patients underwent randomization, and 417 patients were included in final analyses. At 30 days, death from any cause had occurred in 100 of 209 patients (47.8%) in the ECLS group and in 102 of 208 patients (49.0%) in the control group (relative risk, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.19; P = 0.81). The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 7 days (interquartile range, 4 to 12) in the ECLS group and 5 days (interquartile range, 3 to 9) in the control group (median difference, 1 day; 95% CI, 0 to 2). The safety outcome consisting of moderate or severe bleeding occurred in 23.4% of the patients in the ECLS group and in 9.6% of those in the control group (relative risk, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.50 to 3.95); peripheral vascular complications warranting intervention occurred in 11.0% and 3.8%, respectively (relative risk, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.31 to 6.25). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock with planned early revascularization, the risk of death from any cause at the 30-day follow-up was not lower among the patients who received ECLS therapy than among those who received medical therapy alone. (Funded by the Else Kröner Fresenius Foundation and others; ECLS-SHOCK ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03637205.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis