Real-world experience of patients with multiple myeloma receiving ide-cel after a prior BCMA-targeted therapy

Christopher J. Ferreri(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Michelle A.T. Hildebrandt(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Hamza Hashmi(Medical University of South Carolina), Leyla Shune(University of Kansas Medical Center), Joseph P. McGuirk(University of Kansas Medical Center), Douglas W. Sborov(University of Utah), Charlotte B Wagner(University of Utah), Mehmet H. Kocoglu(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Aaron P. Rapoport(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Shebli Atrash(Levine Cancer Institute), Peter M. Voorhees(Levine Cancer Institute), Jack Khouri(Cleveland Clinic), Danai Dima(Cleveland Clinic), Aimaz Afrough(Southwestern Medical Center), Gurbakhash Kaur(Southwestern Medical Center), Larry D. Anderson(Southwestern Medical Center), Gary Simmons(Virginia Commonwealth University), James A. Davis(Medical University of South Carolina), Nilesh Kalariya(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Lauren C. Peres(Moffitt Cancer Center), Yi Lin(Mayo Clinic in Arizona), Murali Janakiram(City of Hope), Omar Nadeem(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Melissa Alsina(Moffitt Cancer Center), Frederick L. Locke(Moffitt Cancer Center), Surbhi Sidana(Stanford University), Doris K. Hansen(Moffitt Cancer Center), Krina K. Patel(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Omar Castañeda Puglianini(Moffitt Cancer Center)
Blood Cancer Journal
August 9, 2023
Cited by 105Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Most patients with multiple myeloma experience disease relapse after treatment with a B-cell maturation antigen-targeted therapy (BCMA-TT), and data describing outcomes for patients treated with sequential BCMA-TT are limited. We analyzed clinical outcomes for patients infused with standard-of-care idecabtagene vicleucel, an anti-BCMA chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, at 11 US medical centers. A total of 50 patients with prior BCMA-TT exposure (38 antibody-drug conjugate, 7 bispecific, 5 CAR T) and 153 patients with no prior BCMA-TT were infused with ide-cel, with a median follow-up duration of 4.5 and 6.0 months, respectively. Safety outcomes between cohorts were comparable. The prior BCMA-TT cohort had a lower overall response rate (74% versus 88%; p = 0.021), median duration of response (7.4 versus 9.6 months; p = 0.03), and median progression-free survival (3.2 months versus 9.0 months; p = 0.0002) compared to the cohort without prior BCMA-TT. All five patients who received a prior anti-BCMA CAR T responded to ide-cel, and survival outcomes were best for this subgroup. In conclusion, treatment with ide-cel yielded meaningful clinical responses in real-world patients exposed to a prior BCMA-TT, though response rates and durability were suboptimal compared to those not treated with a prior BCMA-TT.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis