Vorasidenib in IDH1- or IDH2-Mutant Low-Grade Glioma

Ingo K. Mellinghoff(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Martin J. van den Bent(Rabin Medical Center), Deborah T. Blumenthal(Sorbonne Université), Mehdi Touat(Institut du Cerveau), Katherine B. Peters(Rabin Medical Center), Jennifer Clarke(University of California, San Francisco), Joe Mendez(Rabin Medical Center), Shlomit Yust‐Katz(Rabin Medical Center), Liam Welsh(Royal Marsden Hospital), Warren Mason(Sorbonne Université), François Ducray(Sorbonne Université), Yoshie Umemura(University of Michigan–Ann Arbor), Burt Nabors(Rabin Medical Center), Matthias Holdhoff(Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center), Andreas F. Hottinger(Rabin Medical Center), Yoshiki Arakawa(Rabin Medical Center), Juan Manuel Sepúlveda-Sánchez(Sorbonne Université), Wolfgang Wick(University Hospital Heidelberg), Riccardo Soffietti(Sorbonne Université), James Perry(Sorbonne Université), Pierre Giglio(The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center), Macarena de la Fuente(University of Miami), Elizabeth A. Maher(Rabin Medical Center), Steven Schoenfeld(Rabin Medical Center), Dan Zhao(Sorbonne Université), Shuchi S. Pandya(Sorbonne Université), Lori Steelman(Rabin Medical Center), Islam Hassan(Sorbonne Université), Patrick Y. Wen(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Timothy F. Cloughesy(Sorbonne Université)
New England Journal of Medicine
June 4, 2023
Cited by 700Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant grade 2 gliomas are malignant brain tumors that cause considerable disability and premature death. Vorasidenib, an oral brain-penetrant inhibitor of mutant IDH1 and IDH2 enzymes, showed preliminary activity in IDH-mutant gliomas. METHODS: In a double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with residual or recurrent grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma who had undergone no previous treatment other than surgery to receive either oral vorasidenib (40 mg once daily) or matched placebo in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was imaging-based progression-free survival according to blinded assessment by an independent review committee. The key secondary end point was the time to the next anticancer intervention. Crossover to vorasidenib from placebo was permitted on confirmation of imaging-based disease progression. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 331 patients were assigned to receive vorasidenib (168 patients) or placebo (163 patients). At a median follow-up of 14.2 months, 226 patients (68.3%) were continuing to receive vorasidenib or placebo. Progression-free survival was significantly improved in the vorasidenib group as compared with the placebo group (median progression-free survival, 27.7 months vs. 11.1 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27 to 0.56; P<0.001). The time to the next intervention was significantly improved in the vorasidenib group as compared with the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.43; P<0.001). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 22.8% of the patients who received vorasidenib and in 13.5% of those who received placebo. An increased alanine aminotransferase level of grade 3 or higher occurred in 9.6% of the patients who received vorasidenib and in no patients who received placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma, vorasidenib significantly improved progression-free survival and delayed the time to the next intervention. (Funded by Servier; INDIGO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04164901.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis