Phase II, Open-Label Study of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib in Patients With <i>BRAF</i><sup>V600</sup>-Mutant Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Gregory J. Riely(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Egbert F. Smit(Leiden University Medical Center), Myung‐Ju Ahn(Samsung Medical Center), Enriqueta Felip(Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari), Suresh S. Ramalingam(Emory University), Anne S. Tsao(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Melissa L. Johnson(Sarah Cannon), Francesco Gelsomino(Azienda USL di Bologna), Raymond M. Esper(Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute), Ernest Nadal(Institut Català d'Ornitologia), Michael Offin(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Mariano Provencio(Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda), Jeffrey Clarke(Duke Medical Center), Maen Hussain(Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute), Gregory A. Otterson(The Ohio State University), Ibiayi Dagogo‐Jack(Massachusetts General Hospital), Jonathan W. Goldman(University of California, Los Angeles), Daniel Morgensztern(Washington University in St. Louis), Ann Alcasid(Pfizer (United States)), Tiziana Usari(Pfizer (Italy)), Paul Wissel(Pfizer (United States)), Keith D. Wilner(Pfizer (United States)), Nuzhat Pathan(Pfizer (United States)), Svitlana Tonkovyd, Bruce E. Johnson(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
June 4, 2023
Cited by 111Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE The combination of encorafenib (BRAF inhibitor) plus binimetinib (MEK inhibitor) has demonstrated clinical efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in patients with BRAF V600E/K -mutant metastatic melanoma. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of encorafenib plus binimetinib in patients with BRAF V600E -mutant metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS In this ongoing, open-label, single-arm, phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03915951 ), patients with BRAF V600E -mutant metastatic NSCLC received oral encorafenib 450 mg once daily plus binimetinib 45 mg twice daily in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by independent radiology review (IRR). Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, time to response, and safety. RESULTS At data cutoff, 98 patients (59 treatment-naïve and 39 previously treated) with BRAF V600E -mutant metastatic NSCLC received encorafenib plus binimetinib. Median duration of treatment was 9.2 months with encorafenib and 8.4 months with binimetinib. ORR by IRR was 75% (95% CI, 62 to 85) in treatment-naïve and 46% (95% CI, 30 to 63) in previously treated patients; median DOR was not estimable (NE; 95% CI, 23.1 to NE) and 16.7 months (95% CI, 7.4 to NE), respectively. DCR after 24 weeks was 64% in treatment-naïve and 41% in previously treated patients. Median PFS was NE (95% CI, 15.7 to NE) in treatment-naïve and 9.3 months (95% CI, 6.2 to NE) in previously treated patients. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were nausea (50%), diarrhea (43%), and fatigue (32%). TRAEs led to dose reductions in 24 (24%) and permanent discontinuation of encorafenib plus binimetinib in 15 (15%) patients. One grade 5 TRAE of intracranial hemorrhage was reported. Interactive visualization of the data presented in this article is available at the PHAROS dashboard ( https://clinical-trials.dimensions.ai/pharos/ ). CONCLUSION For patients with treatment-naïve and previously treated BRAF V600E -mutant metastatic NSCLC, encorafenib plus binimetinib showed a meaningful clinical benefit with a safety profile consistent with that observed in the approved indication in melanoma.


Related Papers