Management of Lymph Node–positive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review

Ashwin Sachdeva(University of Manchester), Luke A. McGuinness(South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust), Łukasz Zapała(Medical University of Warsaw), I. Greco(Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi), Herney Andrés García‐Perdomo(Universidad del Valle), Mithun Kailavasan(Nottingham City Hospital), Tiago Antunes‐Lopes(Hospital de São João), Benjamin Ayres(St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Lenka Barreto, Riccardo Campi(Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi), Juanita Crook(BC Cancer Agency), Peter A.S. Johnstone(Moffitt Cancer Center), Vivekanandan Kumar(Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Kenneth Manzie, Jack David Marcus(Patient Advocate Foundation), Andrea Necchi(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Pedro Oliveira(University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro), John Osborne, Lance C. Pagliaro(Mayo Clinic in Arizona), Chris Protzel(Helios Hospital Schwerin), R. Bryan Rumble(American Society of Clinical Oncology), Diego F. Sánchez(Universidad Nacional de Asunción), Philippe E. Spiess(Moffitt Cancer Center), Scott T. Tagawa(Cornell University), Michiel S. van der Heijden(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Arie Parnham(The Christie NHS Foundation Trust), Curtis A. Pettaway(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Maarten Albersen(KU Leuven), Vijay Sangar(University of Manchester), Oscar R. Brouwer(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Vasileios Sakalis(Ippokrateio General Hospital of Thessaloniki)
European Urology
May 18, 2023
Cited by 50Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

CONTEXT: Lymph node (LN) involvement in penile cancer is associated with poor survival. Early diagnosis and management significantly impact survival, with multimodal treatment approaches often considered in advanced disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical effectiveness of treatment options available for the management of inguinal and pelvic lymphadenopathy in men with penile cancer. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and other databases were searched from 1990 to July 2022. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomised comparative studies (NRCSs), and case series (CSs) were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We identified 107 studies, involving 9582 patients from two RCTs, 28 NRCSs, and 77 CSs. The quality of evidence is considered poor. Surgery is the mainstay of LN disease management, with early inguinal LN dissection (ILND) associated with better outcomes. Videoendoscopic ILND may offer comparable survival outcomes to open ILND with lower wound-related morbidity. Ipsilateral pelvic LN dissection (PLND) in N2-3 cases improves overall survival in comparison to no pelvic surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in N2-3 disease showed a pathological complete response rate of 13% and an objective response rate of 51%. Adjuvant radiotherapy may benefit pN2-3 but not pN1 disease. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy may provide a small survival benefit in N3 disease. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy improve outcomes after PLND for pelvic LN metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Early LND improves survival in nodal disease in penile cancer. Multimodal treatments may provide additional benefit in pN2-3 cases; however, data are limited. Therefore, individualised management of patients with nodal disease should be discussed in a multidisciplinary team setting. PATIENT SUMMARY: Spread of penile cancer to the lymph nodes is best managed with surgery, which improves survival and has curative potential. Supplementary treatment, including the use of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, may further improve survival in advanced disease. Patients with penile cancer with lymph node involvement should be treated by a multidisciplinary team.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis