Randomized Phase II Trial of Endocrine Therapy With or Without Ribociclib After Progression on Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibition in Hormone Receptor–Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: MAINTAIN Trial

Kevin Kalinsky(Emory University), Melissa Accordino(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Codruța Chiuzan(Northwell Health), Prabhjot S. Mundi(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Elizabeth Sakach(Emory University), Claire Sathe(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Heejoon Ahn(Northwell Health), Meghna S. Trivedi(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Yelena Novik(NYU Langone Health), Amy Tiersten(Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai), George Raptis(Northwell Health), Lea Baer(State University of New York), Sun Young Oh(Montefiore Medical Center), Amelia Zelnak(Northside Hospital), Kari B. Wisinski(University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center), Eleni Andreopoulou(Cornell University), William J. Gradishar(Northwestern University), Erica Stringer-Reasor(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Sonya Reid(Vanderbilt University Medical Center), Anne O’Dea(University of Kansas Medical Center), Ruth O’Regan(University of Rochester Medical Center), Katherine D. Crew(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Dawn L. Hershman(Columbia University Irving Medical Center)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
May 19, 2023
Cited by 188

Abstract

PURPOSE Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) with endocrine therapy (ET) improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in hormone receptor–positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2–) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Although preclinical and clinical data demonstrate a benefit in changing ET and continuing a CDK4/6i at progression, no randomized prospective trials have evaluated this approach. METHODS In this investigator-initiated, phase II, double-blind placebo-controlled trial in patients with HR+/HER2– MBC whose cancer progressed during ET and CDK4/6i, participants switched ET (fulvestrant or exemestane) from ET used pre-random assignment and randomly assigned 1:1 to the CDK4/6i ribociclib versus placebo. PFS was the primary end point, defined as time from random assignment to disease progression or death. Assuming a median PFS of 3.8 months with placebo, we had 80% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.58 (corresponding to a median PFS of at least 6.5 months with ribociclib) with 120 patients randomly assigned using a one-sided log-rank test and significance level set at 2.5%. RESULTS Of the 119 randomly assigned participants, 103 (86.5%) previously received palbociclib and 14 participants received ribociclib (11.7%). There was a statistically significant PFS improvement for patients randomly assigned to switched ET plus ribociclib (median, 5.29 months; 95% CI, 3.02 to 8.12 months) versus switched ET plus placebo (median, 2.76 months; 95% CI, 2.66 to 3.25 months) HR, 0.57 (95% CI, 0.39 to 0.85); P = .006. At 6 and 12 months, the PFS rate was 41.2% and 24.6% with ribociclib, respectively, compared with 23.9% and 7.4% with placebo. CONCLUSION In this randomized trial, there was a significant PFS benefit for patients with HR+/HER2– MBC who switched ET and received ribociclib compared with placebo after previous CDK4/6i and different ET.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis