Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy

Yogesh K. Dwivedi(Symbiosis International University), Nir Kshetri(University of North Carolina at Greensboro), Laurie Hughes(Swansea University), Emma Slade(University of Bristol), Anand Jeyaraj(Wright State University), Arpan Kumar Kar(Indian Institute of Technology Delhi), Abdullah M. Baabdullah(King Abdulaziz University), Alex Koohang(Georgia State University), Vishnupriya Raghavan(NIIT (India)), Manju Ahuja(University of Louisville), Hanaa Albanna(Northumbria University), Mousa Ahmad Albashrawi(King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals), Adil S. Al-Busaidi(Sultan Qaboos University), Janarthanan Balakrishnan(National Institute of Technology Tiruchirappalli), Yves Barlette(Montpellier Business School), Sriparna Basu(Fore School of Management), Indranil Bose(Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad), Laurence Brooks(University of Sheffield), Dimitrios Buhalis(Bournemouth University), Lemuria Carter(UNSW Sydney), Soumyadeb Chowdhury(TBS Education), Tom Crick(Swansea University), Scott W. Cunningham(Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Gareth H. Davies(Swansea University), Robert M. Davison(City University of Hong Kong), Rahul Dé(University of Bristol), Denis Dennehy(College of Charleston), Yanqing Duan(University of Bedfordshire), Rameshwar Dubey(Montpellier Business School), Rohita Dwivedi(Symbiosis International University), John S. Edwards(Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Carlos Flavián(Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Robin Gauld(Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Varun Grover(University of Arkansas at Fayetteville), Mei‐Chih Hu(University of Louisville), Marijn Janssen(College of Charleston), Paul Jones(College of Charleston), Iris Junglas(College of Charleston), Sangeeta Khorana(College of Charleston), Sascha Kraus(Free University of Bozen-Bolzano), Kai R. Larsen(Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Paul Latreille(Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Sven Laumer(College of Charleston), Tegwen Malik(University of Manchester), Abbas Mardani(Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Marcello Mariani(Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Sunil Mithas(Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Emmanuel Mogaji(Oklahoma State University), Jeretta Horn Nord(College of Charleston), Siobhán O’Connor(University of Manchester), Fevzi Okumus(Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Margherita Pagani(SKEMA Business School), Neeraj Pandey(Free University of Bozen-Bolzano), Savvas Papagiannidis(Aston University), Ilias O. Pappas(Free University of Bozen-Bolzano), Nishith Pathak(College of Charleston), Jan Pries‐Heje(National Institute of Technology Tiruchirappalli), Ramakrishnan Raman(College of Charleston), Nripendra P. Rana(College of Charleston), Sven‐Volker Rehm(Humans and management in society), Samuel Ribeiro‐Navarrete(Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Alexander Richter(College of Charleston), Frantz Rowe(Laboratoire d'Economie et de Management de Nantes Atlantique), Suprateek Sarker(Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Bernd Carsten Stahl(Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Manoj Tiwari(Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Wil van der Aalst(Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Viswanath Venkatesh(Swansea University), Giampaolo Viglia(College of Charleston), Michael Wade(Prin. L. N. Welingkar Institute of Management Development and Research), Paul Walton(Delft University of Technology), Jochen Wirtz(College of Charleston), Ryan Wright(College of Charleston)
International Journal of Information Management
March 11, 2023
Cited by 3,596Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Transformative artificially intelligent tools, such as ChatGPT, designed to generate sophisticated text indistinguishable from that produced by a human, are applicable across a wide range of contexts. The technology presents opportunities as well as, often ethical and legal, challenges, and has the potential for both positive and negative impacts for organisations, society, and individuals. Offering multi-disciplinary insight into some of these, this article brings together 43 contributions from experts in fields such as computer science, marketing, information systems, education, policy, hospitality and tourism, management, publishing, and nursing. The contributors acknowledge ChatGPT’s capabilities to enhance productivity and suggest that it is likely to offer significant gains in the banking, hospitality and tourism, and information technology industries, and enhance business activities, such as management and marketing. Nevertheless, they also consider its limitations, disruptions to practices, threats to privacy and security, and consequences of biases, misuse, and misinformation. However, opinion is split on whether ChatGPT’s use should be restricted or legislated. Drawing on these contributions, the article identifies questions requiring further research across three thematic areas: knowledge, transparency, and ethics; digital transformation of organisations and societies; and teaching, learning, and scholarly research. The avenues for further research include: identifying skills, resources, and capabilities needed to handle generative AI; examining biases of generative AI attributable to training datasets and processes; exploring business and societal contexts best suited for generative AI implementation; determining optimal combinations of human and generative AI for various tasks; identifying ways to assess accuracy of text produced by generative AI; and uncovering the ethical and legal issues in using generative AI across different contexts.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis