Rucaparib or Physician’s Choice in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Karim Fizazi(Université Paris-Saclay), Josep M. Piulats(Université Paris-Saclay), M. Neil Reaume(Université Paris-Saclay), Peter Ostler(Université Paris-Saclay), Ray McDermott(Université Paris-Saclay), Joel Roger Gingerich(Université Paris-Saclay), Elias Pintus(Guy's Hospital), Srikala S. Sridhar(Université Paris-Saclay), Richard Bambury(Université Paris-Saclay), Urban Emmenegger(Sunnybrook Health Science Centre), Henriette Lindberg(Université Paris-Saclay), David Morris(Université Paris-Saclay), Franco Nolè(Université Paris-Saclay), John Staffurth(Université Paris-Saclay), Charles H. Redfern(Université Paris-Saclay), M.I. Sáez(Université Paris-Saclay), Wassim Abida(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Gedske Daugaard(Université Paris-Saclay), Axel Heidenreich(Université Paris-Saclay), Laurence E. Krieger(Université Paris-Saclay), Brieuc Sautois(Université Paris-Saclay), Andrea Loehr(Université Paris-Saclay), Darrin Despain(Université Paris-Saclay), Catherine Liston‐Heyes(Université Paris-Saclay), Simon P. Watkins(Université Paris-Saclay), Simon Chowdhury(Guy's Hospital), Charles J. Ryan(Université Paris-Saclay), Alan H. Bryce(Université Paris-Saclay)
New England Journal of Medicine
February 16, 2023
Cited by 409Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: alteration. Data are needed to confirm and expand on the findings of the phase 2 study. METHODS: alteration and who had disease progression after treatment with a second-generation androgen-receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI). We randomly assigned the patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral rucaparib (600 mg twice daily) or a physician's choice control (docetaxel or a second-generation ARPI [abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide]). The primary outcome was the median duration of imaging-based progression-free survival according to independent review. RESULTS: alteration. At 62 months, the duration of imaging-based progression-free survival was significantly longer in the rucaparib group than in the control group, both in the BRCA subgroup (median, 11.2 months and 6.4 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36 to 0.69) and in the intention-to-treat group (median, 10.2 months and 6.4 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80; P<0.001 for both comparisons). In an exploratory analysis in the ATM subgroup, the median duration of imaging-based progression-free survival was 8.1 months in the rucaparib group and 6.8 months in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.52). The most frequent adverse events with rucaparib were fatigue and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: alteration. (Funded by Clovis Oncology; TRITON3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02975934.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis