The World Health Organization’s Disease Outbreak News: A retrospective database

Colin J. Carlson(Georgetown University), Matthew R Boyce(Georgetown University), Margaret M. Dunne(London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine), Ellie Graeden(Georgetown University), Jessica Lin(Georgetown University), Yasser Omar Abdellatif(Georgetown University), Max A. Palys(Georgetown University), Munir Pavez(Georgetown University), Alexandra Phelan(Georgetown University), Rebecca Katz(Walsh University)
PLOS Global Public Health
January 25, 2023
Cited by 32Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) notifies the global community about disease outbreaks through the Disease Outbreak News (DON). These online reports tell important stories about both outbreaks themselves and the high-level decision making that governs information sharing during public health emergencies. However, they have been used only minimally in global health scholarship to date. Here, we collate all 2,789 of these reports from their first use through the start of the Covid-19 pandemic (January 1996 to December 2019), and develop an annotated database of the subjective and often inconsistent information they contain. We find that these reports are dominated by a mix of persistent worldwide threats (particularly influenza and cholera) and persistent epidemics (like Ebola virus disease in Africa or MERS-CoV in the Middle East), but also document important periods in history like the anthrax bioterrorist attacks at the turn of the century, the spread of chikungunya and Zika virus to the Americas, or even recent lapses in progress towards polio elimination. We present three simple vignettes that show how researchers can use these data to answer both qualitative and quantitative questions about global outbreak dynamics and public health response. However, we also find that the retrospective value of these reports is visibly limited by inconsistent reporting (e.g., of disease names, case totals, mortality, and actions taken to curtail spread). We conclude that sharing a transparent rubric for which outbreaks are considered reportable, and adopting more standardized formats for sharing epidemiological metadata, might help make the DON more useful to researchers and policymakers.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis