High-dose melphalan treatment significantly increases mutational burden at relapse in multiple myeloma

Mehmet Samur(Harvard University), Marco Roncador(University Hospital of Zurich), Anıl Aktaş Samur(Harvard University), Mariateresa Fulciniti(Harvard University), Abdul Hamid Bazarbachi(Jacobi Medical Center), Raphaël Szalat(Boston University), Masood A. Shammas(Harvard University), Adam S. Sperling(Harvard University), Paul G. Richardson(Harvard University), Florence Magrangeas(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Stéphane Minvielle(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Aurore Perrot, Jill Corre, Philippe Moreau(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Anjan Thakurta(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Giovanni Parmigiani(Harvard University), Kenneth C. Anderson(Harvard University), Hervé Avet‐Loiseau, Nikhil C. Munshi(Harvard University)
Blood
January 5, 2023
Cited by 47Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

High-dose melphalan (HDM) improves progression-free survival in multiple myeloma (MM), yet melphalan is a DNA-damaging alkylating agent; therefore, we assessed its mutational effect on surviving myeloma cells by analyzing paired MM samples collected at diagnosis and relapse in the IFM 2009 study. We performed deep whole-genome sequencing on samples from 68 patients, 43 of whom were treated with RVD (lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone) and 25 with RVD + HDM. Although the number of mutations was similar at diagnosis in both groups (7137 vs 7230; P = .67), the HDM group had significantly more mutations at relapse (9242 vs 13 383, P = .005). No change in the frequency of copy number alterations or structural variants was observed. The newly acquired mutations were typically associated with DNA damage and double-stranded breaks and were predominantly on the transcribed strand. A machine learning model, using this unique pattern, predicted patients who would receive HDM with high sensitivity, specificity, and positive prediction value. Clonal evolution analysis showed that all patients treated with HDM had clonal selection, whereas a static progression was observed with RVD. A significantly higher percentage of mutations were subclonal in the HDM cohort. Intriguingly, patients treated with HDM who achieved complete remission (CR) had significantly more mutations at relapse yet had similar survival rates as those treated with RVD who achieved CR. This similarity could have been due to HDM relapse samples having significantly more neoantigens. Overall, our study identifies increased genomic changes associated with HDM and provides rationale to further understand clonal complexity.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis