A 24-Week, All-Oral Regimen for Rifampin-Resistant Tuberculosis

Bern-Thomas Nyang’wa(Médecins Sans Frontières), Catherine Berry(Médecins Sans Frontières), Emil Kazounis(Médecins Sans Frontières), Ilaria Motta(Médecins Sans Frontières), Nargiza Parpieva(Médecins Sans Frontières), Zinaida Tigay(Médecins Sans Frontières), Varvara Solodovnikova(Médecins Sans Frontières), Irina Liverko(Médecins Sans Frontières), Ronelle Moodliar(Médecins Sans Frontières), Matthew Dodd(Médecins Sans Frontières), Nosipho Ngubane(Médecins Sans Frontières), Mohammed Rassool(Médecins Sans Frontières), Timothy D. McHugh(Médecins Sans Frontières), Melvin Spigelman(Médecins Sans Frontières), David Moore(Médecins Sans Frontières), Koert Ritmeijer(Médecins Sans Frontières), Philipp du Cros(Médecins Sans Frontières), Katherine Fielding(Médecins Sans Frontières)
New England Journal of Medicine
December 21, 2022
Cited by 347Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with rifampin-resistant tuberculosis, all-oral treatment regimens that are more effective, shorter, and have a more acceptable side-effect profile than current regimens are needed. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, phase 2-3, multicenter, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three 24-week, all-oral regimens for the treatment of rifampin-resistant tuberculosis. Patients in Belarus, South Africa, and Uzbekistan who were 15 years of age or older and had rifampin-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis were enrolled. In stage 2 of the trial, a 24-week regimen of bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin (BPaLM) was compared with a 9-to-20-month standard-care regimen. The primary outcome was an unfavorable status (a composite of death, treatment failure, treatment discontinuation, loss to follow-up, or recurrence of tuberculosis) at 72 weeks after randomization. The noninferiority margin was 12 percentage points. RESULTS: Recruitment was terminated early. Of 301 patients in stage 2 of the trial, 145, 128, and 90 patients were evaluable in the intention-to-treat, modified intention-to-treat, and per-protocol populations, respectively. In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, 11% of the patients in the BPaLM group and 48% of those in the standard-care group had a primary-outcome event (risk difference, -37 percentage points; 96.6% confidence interval [CI], -53 to -22). In the per-protocol analysis, 4% of the patients in the BPaLM group and 12% of those in the standard-care group had a primary-outcome event (risk difference, -9 percentage points; 96.6% CI, -22 to 4). In the as-treated population, the incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher or serious adverse events was lower in the BPaLM group than in the standard-care group (19% vs. 59%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with rifampin-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis, a 24-week, all-oral regimen was noninferior to the accepted standard-care treatment, and it had a better safety profile. (Funded by Médecins sans Frontières; TB-PRACTECAL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02589782.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis