Zanubrutinib or Ibrutinib in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Jennifer R. Brown(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Barbara Eichhorst(Düsseldorf University Hospital), Peter Hillmen(St James's University Hospital), Wojciech Jurczak(National Institute of Oncology), Maciej Kaźmierczak(Integrated Oncology (United States)), Nicole Lamanna(Integrated Oncology (United States)), Susan O’Brien(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Constantine S. Tam(Monash University), Lugui Qiu(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Keshu Zhou(Düsseldorf University Hospital), Martin Šimkovič(University Hospital Hradec Králové), Jiřı́ Mayer(University Hospital Brno), Amanda Gillespie-Twardy(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Alessandra Ferrajoli(Integrated Oncology (United States)), Peter Ganly(Integrated Oncology (United States)), Robert Weinkove(Düsseldorf University Hospital), Sebastian Grosicki(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Andrzej Mital(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Tadeusz Robak(Integrated Oncology (United States)), Anders Österborg(Integrated Oncology (United States)), Habte Yimer(The US Oncology Network), Tommi Salmi(Integrated Oncology (United States)), Megan-Der-Yu Wang(Düsseldorf University Hospital), Lina Fu(Integrated Oncology (United States)), Jessica Li(Integrated Oncology (United States)), Kenneth Wu(Integrated Oncology (United States)), Aileen Cohen(Integrated Oncology (United States)), Mazyar Shadman(University of Washington)
New England Journal of Medicine
December 13, 2022
Cited by 447Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a multinational, phase 3, head-to-head trial, ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, was compared with zanubrutinib, a BTK inhibitor with greater specificity, as treatment for relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). In prespecified interim analyses, zanubrutinib was superior to ibrutinib with respect to overall response (the primary end point). Data from the final analysis of progression-free survival are now available. METHODS: We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with relapsed or refractory CLL or SLL who had received at least one previous course of therapy to receive zanubrutinib or ibrutinib until the occurrence of disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. In this final analysis, progression-free survival (a key secondary end point) was assessed with the use of a hierarchical testing strategy to determine whether zanubrutinib was noninferior to ibrutinib. If noninferiority was established, the superiority of zanubrutinib was assessed and claimed if the two-sided P value was less than 0.05. RESULTS: mutation, or both, those who received zanubrutinib had longer progression-free survival than those who received ibrutinib (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.88); progression-free survival across other major subgroups consistently favored zanubrutinib. The percentage of patients with an overall response was higher in the zanubrutinib group than in the ibrutinib group. The safety profile of zanubrutinib was better than that of ibrutinib, with fewer adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation and fewer cardiac events, including fewer cardiac events leading to treatment discontinuation or death. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with relapsed or refractory CLL or SLL, progression-free survival was significantly longer among patients who received zanubrutinib than among those who received ibrutinib, and zanubrutinib was associated with fewer cardiac adverse events. (Funded by BeiGene; ALPINE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03734016.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis