Unspecific<sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 Bone Uptake Evaluated Through PSMA-11 PET, Bone Scanning, and MRI Triple Validation in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer

Robert Seifert(University Hospital Münster), Tuğçe Telli(Deutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung), Marcel Opitz(Deutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung), Francesco Barbato(Deutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung), Christoph Berliner(Deutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung), Michael Nader(Essen University Hospital), Lale Umutlu(Essen University Hospital), Martin Stuschke(Essen University Hospital), Boris Hadaschik(Essen University Hospital), Ken Herrmann(Essen University Hospital), Wolfgang P. Fendler(Essen University Hospital)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
December 2, 2022
Cited by 68Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

<sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 PET is used in the management of patients with prostate cancer. However, recent reports indicate a high rate of unspecific bone uptake (UBU) with <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007, which may lead to a false-positive diagnosis. UBU has not been evaluated thoroughly. Here, we evaluate the frequency of UBU and bone metastases separately for <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 and <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 in biochemical recurrence (interindividual comparison). Additionally, we investigate UBU seen in <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 through follow-up examinations (intraindividual comparison) using <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET, bone scintigraphy, and MRI. <b>Methods:</b> First, all patients (<i>n</i> = 383) who underwent <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET between January 2020 and December 2020 and all patients (<i>n</i> = 409) who underwent <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 PET between January 2020 and November 2021 due to biochemical recurrence were included for an interindividual comparison of bone metastases and UBU rate. In a second approach, we regarded all patients with UBU in <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007, characterized by focal bone uptake with an SUV<sub>max</sub> &gt; 4 and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤ 5 ng/mL, who underwent additional <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET (<i>n</i> = 17) (interindividual comparison). Of these, 12 patients also had bone scintigraphy and whole-body MRI within a 1- to 5-wk interval. Bone uptake seen on <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 but not on any of the other 4 modalities (CT, MRI [<i>n</i> = 1], bone scanning, and <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET) was recorded as false-positive. <b>Results:</b> Patients scanned with <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 PET had a significantly higher rate of UBU than those scanned with <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 (140 vs. 64; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001); however, the rate of bone metastases was not significantly different (72 vs. 64; <i>P</i><b>=</b> 0.7). In the intraindividual comparison group, workup by CT, MRI, bone scanning, and <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET resulted in a positive predictive value for <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 focal bone uptake (mean SUV<sub>max</sub>, 6.1 ± 2.9) per patient and per lesion of 8.3% and 3.6%, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> In patients with PSA ≤ 5 ng/mL and SUV &gt; 4 at biochemical recurrence, most <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 focal bone uptake is likely to be false-positive and therefore due to UBU. In the case of low clinical likelihood of metastatic disease, <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 bone uptake without morphologic surrogate should be assessed carefully with regard to localization and clinical context. However, the rate of bone metastases was not higher with <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 in the clinical routine, indicating that experienced reporting physicians adjust for UBU findings.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis