Recent Bendamustine Treatment before Apheresis Has a Negative Impact on Outcomes in Patients with Large B-Cell Lymphoma Receiving Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy

Gloria Iacoboni(Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari), Ana África Martín López(Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca), Katarzyna Aleksandra Jalowiec(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Mi Kwon(Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón), Kai Rejeski(LMU Klinikum), Victor Navarro Garcés(Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology), Paula Amat(Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia), Juan Luis Reguera(Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío), Laura Gallur(Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari), Sara Gutiérrez-Herrero(Centro de Investigación del Cáncer), Claire Roddie(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Gillen Oarbeascoa(Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón), Ana Benzaquén(Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia), Cecilia Carpio(Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari), Lucía López‐Corral(Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca), Rafael Hernani(Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia), Mariana Bastos‐Oreiro(Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón), Marion Subklewe(LMU Klinikum), Maeve O’Reilly(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Lourdes Martín(Centro de Investigación del Cáncer), Pere Barba(Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari)
Blood
November 15, 2022
Cited by 28Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE Approximately 30%-40% of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) infused with CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells achieve durable responses. Consensus guidelines suggest avoiding bendamustine before apheresis, but specific data in this setting are lacking. We report distinct outcomes after CAR T-cell therapy according to previous bendamustine exposure. METHODS The study included CAR T-cell recipients from seven European sites. Safety, efficacy, and CAR T-cell expansion kinetics were analyzed according to preapheresis bendamustine exposure. Additional studies on the impact of the washout period and bendamustine dose were performed. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score matching (PSM) analyses were carried out for all efficacy comparisons between bendamustine-exposed and bendamustine-naïve patients. RESULTS The study included 439 patients with R/R LBCL infused with CD19-targeted commercial CAR T cells, of whom 80 had received bendamustine before apheresis. Exposed patients had significantly lower CD3+ cells and platelets at apheresis. These patients had a lower overall response rate (ORR, 53% v 72%; P < .01), a shorter progression-free survival (PFS, 3.1 v 6.2 months; P = .04), and overall survival (OS, 10.3 v 23.5 months; P = .01) in comparison with the bendamustine-naïve group. Following adjustment methods for baseline variables, these differences were mitigated. Focusing on the impact of bendamustine washout before apheresis, those with recent (<9 months) exposure (N = 42) displayed a lower ORR (40% v 72%; P < .01), shorter PFS (1.3 v 6.2 months; P < .01), and OS (4.6 v 23.5 months; P < .01) in comparison with bendamustine-naïve patients. These differences remained significant after IPTW and PSM analysis. Conversely, the cumulative dose of bendamustine before apheresis did not affect CAR-T efficacy outcomes. CONCLUSION Recent bendamustine exposure before apheresis was associated with negative treatment outcomes after CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy and should be therefore avoided in CAR T-cell candidates.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis