Durvalumab With or Without Tremelimumab in Combination With Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase III POSEIDON Study

Melissa L. Johnson(Sarah Cannon), Byoung Chul Cho(Yonsei University), Alexander Luft(Leningrad Regional Cancer Center), Jorge Alatorre-Alexander, Sarayut Lucien Geater(Prince of Songkla University), К. К. Лактионов(Ministry of Health), Sang‐We Kim(Ulsan College), Grygorii Ursol, Maen Hussein(Sarah Cannon), Farah Louise Lim(Queen Mary University of London), Cheng‐Ta Yang(Taoyuan Chang Gung Memorial Hospital), Luiz H. Araujo(Instituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA), Haruhiro Saito(Kanagawa Prefectural Hospital Organization), Niels Reinmuth(German Center for Lung Research), Xiaojin Shi(AstraZeneca (Japan)), Lynne Poole(AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)), Solange Peters(University Hospital of Lausanne), Edward B. Garon(University of California, Los Angeles), Tony Mok(Chinese University of Hong Kong), for the POSEIDON investigators
Journal of Clinical Oncology
November 3, 2022
Cited by 428Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE The open-label, phase III POSEIDON study evaluated tremelimumab plus durvalumab and chemotherapy (T + D + CT) and durvalumab plus chemotherapy (D + CT) versus chemotherapy alone (CT) in first-line metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). METHODS Patients (n = 1,013) with EGFR/ ALK wild-type mNSCLC were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to tremelimumab 75 mg plus durvalumab 1,500 mg and platinum-based chemotherapy for up to four 21-day cycles, followed by durvalumab once every 4 weeks until progression and one additional tremelimumab dose; durvalumab plus chemotherapy for up to four 21-day cycles, followed by durvalumab once every 4 weeks until progression; or chemotherapy for up to six 21-day cycles (with or without maintenance pemetrexed; all arms). Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for D + CT versus CT. Key alpha-controlled secondary end points were PFS and OS for T + D + CT versus CT. RESULTS PFS was significantly improved with D + CT versus CT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.89; P = .0009; median, 5.5 v 4.8 months); a trend for improved OS did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.02; P = .0758; median, 13.3 v 11.7 months; 24-month OS, 29.6% v 22.1%). PFS (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.86; P = .0003; median, 6.2 v 4.8 months) and OS (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.92; P = .0030; median, 14.0 v 11.7 months; 24-month OS, 32.9% v 22.1%) were significantly improved with T + D + CT versus CT. Treatment-related adverse events were maximum grade 3/4 in 51.8%, 44.6%, and 44.4% of patients receiving T + D + CT, D + CT, and CT, respectively; 15.5%, 14.1%, and 9.9%, respectively, discontinued treatment because of treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION D + CT significantly improved PFS versus CT. A limited course of tremelimumab added to durvalumab and chemotherapy significantly improved OS and PFS versus CT, without meaningful additional tolerability burden, representing a potential new option in first-line mNSCLC.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis