Five-Year Survival Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer in CheckMate 227

Julie R. Brahmer(Johns Hopkins University), Jong-Seok Lee(Seoul National University Bundang Hospital), Tudor–Eliade Ciuleanu(Institute of Oncology Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta), Reyes Bernabe Caro(Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla), Makoto Nishio(Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research), László Urbán, Clarisse Audigier-Valette(Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Sainte-Anne), Lorena Lupinacci(Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires), Randeep Sangha, Adam Płużański(The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology), Jacobus A. Burgers(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Mauricio Mahave(Fundación Arturo López Pérez), Samreen Ahmed(University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust), Adam J. Schoenfeld(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Luis Paz‐Ares(Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre), Martin Reck(German Center for Lung Research), Hossein Borghaei(Fox Chase Cancer Center), Kenneth J. O’Byrne(Translational Research Institute), Ravi G. Gupta(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Judith Bushong(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Li Li(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Steven I. Blum(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Laura J. Eccles(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Suresh S. Ramalingam(Emory University)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
October 12, 2022
Cited by 372Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: We present 5-year results from CheckMate 227 Part 1, in which nivolumab plus ipilimumab improved overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer, regardless of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. METHODS: alterations and with tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1% or < 1% (n = 1739) were randomly assigned. Patients with tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1% were randomly assigned to first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab alone, or chemotherapy. Patients with tumor PD-L1 < 1% were randomly assigned to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy. End points included exploratory 5-year results for efficacy, safety, and quality of life. RESULTS: At a minimum follow-up of 61.3 months, 5-year OS rates were 24% versus 14% for nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 19% versus 7% (PD-L1 < 1%). The median duration of response was 24.5 versus 6.7 months (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 19.4 versus 4.8 months (PD-L1 < 1%). Among patients surviving 5 years, 66% (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 64% (PD-L1 < 1%) were off nivolumab plus ipilimumab without initiating subsequent systemic anticancer treatment by the 5-year time point. Survival benefit continued after nivolumab plus ipilimumab discontinuation because of treatment-related adverse events, with a 5-year OS rate of 39% (combined PD-L1 ≥ 1% and < 1% populations). Quality of life in 5-year survivors treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was similar to that in the general US population through the 5-year follow-up. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION: With all patients off immunotherapy treatment for ≥ 3 years, nivolumab plus ipilimumab increased 5-year survivorship versus chemotherapy, including long-term, durable clinical benefit regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression. These data support nivolumab plus ipilimumab as an effective first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis