BRCA Mutation Status in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Pivotal Role for Treatment Decision-Making

Francesco Pavese(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Ettore Capoluongo(Federico II University Hospital), Margherita Muratore(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Angelo Minucci(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Cristina Santonocito(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Paola Fuso(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Paola Concolino(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Enrico Di Stasio(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Luisa Carbognin(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Giordana Tiberi(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Giorgia Garganese(Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Giacomo Corrado(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Alba Di Leone(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Daniele Generali(University of Trieste), Simona Maria Fragomeni(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Tatiana D’Angelo(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Gianluca Franceschini(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Riccardo Masetti(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Alessandra Fabi(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Antonino Mulè(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Angela Santoro(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Paolo Belli(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Giampaolo Tortora(Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Giovanni Scambia(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Ida Paris(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic)
Cancers
September 21, 2022
Cited by 39Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by earlier recurrence and shorter survival compared with other types of breast cancer. Moreover, approximately 15 to 25% of all TNBC patients harbor germline BRCA (gBRCA) 1/2 mutations, which confer a more aggressive phenotype. However, TNBC seems to be particularly sensitive to chemotherapy, the so-called ‘triple negative paradox’. Therefore, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is currently considered the preferred approach for early-stage TNBC. BRCA status has also been studied as a predictive biomarker of response to platinum compounds. Although several randomized trials investigated the addition of carboplatin to standard NACT in early-stage TNBC, the role of BRCA status remains unclear. In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated data from 136 consecutive patients with Stage I-III TNBC who received standard NACT with or without the addition of carboplatin, in order to define clinical features and outcomes in BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers and non-carrier controls. Between January 2013 and February 2021, 67 (51.3%) out of 136 patients received a standard anthracyclines/taxane regimen and 69 (50.7%) patients received a platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen. Deleterious germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were identified in 39 (28.7%) patients. Overall, patients with deleterious gBRCA1/2 mutation have significantly higher pCR rate than non-carrier patients (23 [59%] of 39 vs. 33 [34%] of 97; p = 0.008). The benefit of harboring a gBRCA mutation was confirmed only in the subset of patients who received a platinum-based NACT (17 [65.4%] of 26 vs. 13 [30.2%] of 43; p = 0.005) while no differences were found in the platinum-free subgroup. Patients who achieved pCR after NACT had significantly better EFS (OR 4.5; 95% CI 1.9–10.7; p = 0.001) and OS (OR 3.3; 95% CI 1.3–8.9; p = 0.01) than patients who did not, regardless of BRCA1/2 mutation status and type of NACT received. Our results based on real-world evidence show that TNBC patients with the gBRCA1/2 mutation who received platinum-based NACT have a higher pCR rate than non-carrier patients, supporting the use of this chemotherapy regimen in this patient population. Long-term follow-up analyses are needed to further define the role of gBRCA mutation status on clinical outcomes in patients with early-TNBC.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis