Variability of strain engraftment and predictability of microbiome composition after fecal microbiota transplantation across different diseases

Gianluca Ianiro(Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Michal Punčochář(University of Trento), Nicolai Karcher(University of Trento), Serena Porcari(Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Federica Armanini(University of Trento), Francesco Asnicar(University of Trento), Francesco Beghini(University of Trento), Aitor Blanco‐Míguez(University of Trento), Fabio Cumbo(University of Trento), Paolo Manghi(University of Trento), Federica Pinto(University of Trento), Luca Masucci(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Gianluca Quaranta(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Silvia De Giorgi(Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Giusi Desirè Sciumè(Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Stefano Bibbò(Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Federica Del Chierico(Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital), Lorenza Putignani(Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital), Maurizio Sanguinetti(Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic), Antonio Gasbarrini(Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Mireia Valles‐Colomer(University of Trento), Giovanni Cammarota(Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Nicola Segata(University of Trento)
Nature Medicine
September 1, 2022
Cited by 335Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is highly effective against recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection and is considered a promising treatment for other microbiome-related disorders, but a comprehensive understanding of microbial engraftment dynamics is lacking, which prevents informed applications of this therapeutic approach. Here, we performed an integrated shotgun metagenomic systematic meta-analysis of new and publicly available stool microbiomes collected from 226 triads of donors, pre-FMT recipients and post-FMT recipients across eight different disease types. By leveraging improved metagenomic strain-profiling to infer strain sharing, we found that recipients with higher donor strain engraftment were more likely to experience clinical success after FMT (P = 0.017) when evaluated across studies. Considering all cohorts, increased engraftment was noted in individuals receiving FMT from multiple routes (for example, both via capsules and colonoscopy during the same treatment) as well as in antibiotic-treated recipients with infectious diseases compared with antibiotic-naïve patients with noncommunicable diseases. Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria species (including Bifidobacteria) displayed higher engraftment than Firmicutes except for six under-characterized Firmicutes species. Cross-dataset machine learning predicted the presence or absence of species in the post-FMT recipient at 0.77 average AUROC in leave-one-dataset-out evaluation, and highlighted the relevance of microbial abundance, prevalence and taxonomy to infer post-FMT species presence. By exploring the dynamics of microbiome engraftment after FMT and their association with clinical variables, our study uncovered species-specific engraftment patterns and presented machine learning models able to predict donors that might optimize post-FMT specific microbiome characteristics for disease-targeted FMT protocols.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis