Mitigating Bias in Radiology Machine Learning: 3. Performance Metrics

Shahriar Faghani(Mayo Clinic), Bardia Khosravi(Mayo Clinic), Kuan Zhang(Mayo Clinic), Mana Moassefi(Mayo Clinic), Jaidip Jagtap(Mayo Clinic), Fred Nugen(Mayo Clinic), Sanaz Vahdati(Mayo Clinic), Shiba Kuanar(Mayo Clinic), Seyed Moein Rassoulinejad-Mousavi(Mayo Clinic), Yashbir Singh(Mayo Clinic), Diana V. Vera-Garcia(Mayo Clinic), Pouria Rouzrokh(Mayo Clinic), Bradley J. Erickson(Mayo Clinic)
Radiology Artificial Intelligence
August 24, 2022
Cited by 90Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

The increasing use of machine learning (ML) algorithms in clinical settings raises concerns about bias in ML models. Bias can arise at any step of ML creation, including data handling, model development, and performance evaluation. Potential biases in the ML model can be minimized by implementing these steps correctly. This report focuses on performance evaluation and discusses model fitness, as well as a set of performance evaluation toolboxes: namely, performance metrics, performance interpretation maps, and uncertainty quantification. By discussing the strengths and limitations of each toolbox, our report highlights strategies and considerations to mitigate and detect biases during performance evaluations of radiology artificial intelligence models. Keywords: Segmentation, Diagnosis, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) © RSNA, 2022


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis