Changes in Circulating Tumor DNA Reflect Clinical Benefit Across Multiple Studies of Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Diana Merino Vega(Friends of Cancer Research), Katherine K. Nishimura(Cancer Research And Biostatistics), Névine Zariffa, Jeffrey C. Thompson(University of Pennsylvania), Antje Hoering(Cancer Research And Biostatistics), Vanessa Cilento(Cancer Research And Biostatistics), Adam Rosenthal(Cancer Research And Biostatistics), Valsamo Anagnostou(Johns Hopkins University), Jonathan Baden(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Julia A. Beaver(United States Food and Drug Administration), Aadel A. Chaudhuri(Washington University in St. Louis), Darya Chudova(Guardant (United States)), Alexander D. Fine(Foundation Medicine (United States)), Joseph Fiore(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Rachel Hodge(AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)), Darren Hodgson(AstraZeneca (United States)), Nathan Hunkapiller(Menlo School), Daniel M. Klass, Julie Kobie(Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States)), Carol E. Peña(Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States)), Gene Pennello(Office of Science), Neil Peterman(Foundation Medicine (United States)), Reena Philip(Center for Devices and Radiological Health), Katie Quinn(Guardant (United States)), David Raben, Gary L. Rosner(Johns Hopkins University), Mark Sausen(Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States)), Ayse Tezcan(Foundation Medicine (United States)), Qi Xia, Jing Yi, Amanda Young(Foundation Medicine (United States)), Mark Stewart(Friends of Cancer Research), Erica L. Carpenter(University of Pennsylvania), Charu Aggarwal(University of Pennsylvania), Jeff Allen(Friends of Cancer Research)
JCO Precision Oncology
July 1, 2022
Cited by 74Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: As immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) become increasingly used in frontline settings, identifying early indicators of response is needed. Recent studies suggest a role for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in monitoring response to ICI, but uncertainty exists in the generalizability of these studies. Here, the role of ctDNA for monitoring response to ICI is assessed through a standardized approach by assessing clinical trial data from five independent studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patient-level clinical and ctDNA data were pooled and harmonized from 200 patients across five independent clinical trials investigating the treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)-directed monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. CtDNA levels were measured using different ctDNA assays across the studies. Maximum variant allele frequencies were calculated using all somatic tumor-derived variants in each unique patient sample to correlate ctDNA changes with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: < .001). Changes in the maximum variant allele frequencies ctDNA values showed strong association across different outcomes. CONCLUSION: In this pooled analysis of five independent clinical trials, consistent and robust associations between reductions in ctDNA and outcomes were found across multiple end points assessed in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with an ICI. Additional tumor types, stages, and drug classes should be included in future analyses to further validate this. CtDNA may serve as an important tool in clinical development and an early indicator of treatment benefit.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis