Recommendations for clinical interpretation of variants found in non-coding regions of the genome

Jamie M. Ellingford(University of Manchester), Joo Wook Ahn(Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Richard D. Bagnall(The University of Sydney), Diana Baralle(University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust), Stephanie Barton(St Mary's Hospital), C. Ryan Campbell(St Mary's Hospital), Kate Downes(Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Sian Ellard(University of Exeter), Celia Duff‐Farrier(North Bristol NHS Trust), David Fitzpatrick(Western General Hospital), John M. Greally(Albert Einstein College of Medicine), Jodie Ingles(Garvan Institute of Medical Research), Neesha Krishnan(Garvan Institute of Medical Research), Jenny Lord(University of Southampton), Hilary C. Martin(Wellcome Sanger Institute), William G. Newman(University of Manchester), Anne O’Donnell‐Luria(Broad Institute), Simon Ramsden(St Mary's Hospital), Heidi L. Rehm(Broad Institute), Ebony Richardson(Garvan Institute of Medical Research), Moriel Singer‐Berk(Broad Institute), Jenny C. Taylor(Centre for Human Genetics), Maggie Williams(North Bristol NHS Trust), Jordan C. Wood(Broad Institute), Caroline F. Wright(University of Exeter), Steven M. Harrison(Broad Institute), Nicola Whiffin(Broad Institute)
Genome Medicine
July 18, 2022
Cited by 254Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The majority of clinical genetic testing focuses almost exclusively on regions of the genome that directly encode proteins. The important role of variants in non-coding regions in penetrant disease is, however, increasingly being demonstrated, and the use of whole genome sequencing in clinical diagnostic settings is rising across a large range of genetic disorders. Despite this, there is no existing guidance on how current guidelines designed primarily for variants in protein-coding regions should be adapted for variants identified in other genomic contexts. METHODS: We convened a panel of nine clinical and research scientists with wide-ranging expertise in clinical variant interpretation, with specific experience in variants within non-coding regions. This panel discussed and refined an initial draft of the guidelines which were then extensively tested and reviewed by external groups. RESULTS: We discuss considerations specifically for variants in non-coding regions of the genome. We outline how to define candidate regulatory elements, highlight examples of mechanisms through which non-coding region variants can lead to penetrant monogenic disease, and outline how existing guidelines can be adapted for the interpretation of these variants. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations aim to increase the number and range of non-coding region variants that can be clinically interpreted, which, together with a compatible phenotype, can lead to new diagnoses and catalyse the discovery of novel disease mechanisms.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis