Is the observable Universe consistent with the cosmological principle?

Pavan K. Aluri(Indian Institute of Technology BHU), Paolo Cea(Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari), Pravabati Chingangbam(Korea Institute for Advanced Study), M. C. Chu(Chinese University of Hong Kong), R. G. Clowes(University of Lancashire), Damien Hutsemékers(University of Liège), Joby P. Kochappan(Asia Pacific Center for Theoretical Physics), Alexia M Lopez(University of Lancashire), Lang Liü(Kunsan National University), Niels C. M. Martens(University of Bonn), C. J. A. P. Martins(Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences), K. Migkas(University of Bonn), Eoin Ó Colgáin(Sogang University), Pratyush Pranav(Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Lior Shamir(Kansas State University), Ashok K. Singal(Physical Research Laboratory), M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari(The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP)), Jenny Wagner(College of The Bahamas), Shao-Jiang Wang(Chinese Academy of Sciences), David L. Wiltshire(University of Canterbury), Shek Yeung(Chinese University of Hong Kong), Lu Yin(Sogang University), Wen Zhao(University of Science and Technology of China)
Classical and Quantum Gravity
February 24, 2023
Cited by 239Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Abstract The cosmological principle (CP)—the notion that the Universe is spatially isotropic and homogeneous on large scales—underlies a century of progress in cosmology. It is conventionally formulated through the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) cosmologies as the spacetime metric, and culminates in the successful and highly predictive Λ-Cold-Dark-Matter (ΛCDM) model. Yet, tensions have emerged within the ΛCDM model, most notably a statistically significant discrepancy in the value of the Hubble constant, H 0 . Since the notion of cosmic expansion determined by a single parameter is intimately tied to the CP, implications of the H 0 tension may extend beyond ΛCDM to the CP itself. This review surveys current observational hints for deviations from the expectations of the CP, highlighting synergies and disagreements that warrant further study. Setting aside the debate about individual large structures, potential deviations from the CP include variations of cosmological parameters on the sky, discrepancies in the cosmic dipoles, and mysterious alignments in quasar polarizations and galaxy spins. While it is possible that a host of observational systematics are impacting results, it is equally plausible that precision cosmology may have outgrown the FLRW paradigm, an extremely pragmatic but non-fundamental symmetry assumption.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis