Differential diagnostic performance of a panel of plasma biomarkers for different types of dementia

Elisabeth H. Thijssen(Amsterdam Neuroscience), Inge M.W. Verberk(Amsterdam Neuroscience), Jana Kindermans(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Adlin Abramian(Amsterdam Neuroscience), Jeroen Vanbrabant(Ablynx (Belgium)), Andrew J. Ball(Quanterix (United States)), Yolande A.L. Pijnenburg(Amsterdam Neuroscience), Afina W. Lemstra(Amsterdam Neuroscience), Wiesje M. van der Flier(Amsterdam Neuroscience), Erik Stoops(Ablynx (Belgium)), Christophe Hirtz(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Charlotte E. Teunissen(Amsterdam Neuroscience)
Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring
January 1, 2022
Cited by 87Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Abstract Introduction We explored what combination of blood‐based biomarkers (amyloid beta [Aβ] 1‐42/1‐40 , phosphorylated tau [p‐tau]181, neurofilament light [NfL], glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP]) differentiates Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Methods We measured the biomarkers with Simoa in two separate cohorts (n = 160 and n = 152). In one cohort, Aβ 1‐42/1‐40 was also measured with mass spectrometry (MS). We assessed the differential diagnostic value of the markers, by logistic regression with Wald's backward selection. Results MS and Simoa Aβ 1‐42/1‐40 similarly differentiated AD from controls. The Simoa panel that optimally differentiated AD from FTD consisted of NfL and p‐tau181 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.94; cohort 1) or NfL, GFAP, and p‐tau181 (AUC = 0.90; cohort 2). For AD from DLB, the panel consisted of NfL, p‐tau181, and GFAP (AUC = 0.88; cohort 1), and only p‐tau181 (AUC = 0.81; cohort 2). Discussion A combination of plasma p‐tau181, NfL, and GFAP, but not Aβ 1‐42/1‐40 , might be useful to discriminate AD, FTD, and DLB.


Related Papers