Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis Guiding Adjuvant Therapy in Stage II Colon Cancer

Jeanne Tie(The University of Melbourne), Joshua D. Cohen(Johns Hopkins University), Kamel Lahouel(Department of Health), Serigne Lo(The University of Sydney), Yuxuan Wang(Cancer Research Center), Suzanne Kosmider(Western Health), Rachel Wong(Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research), Jeremy Shapiro(Cabrini Medical Center), Margaret Lee(Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research), Sam Harris(Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital), Adnan Khattak(Women's Hospital), Matthew Burge(The University of Queensland), Marion Harris(Monash Health), James Lynam(Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital), Louise Nott(Royal Hobart Hospital), Fiona Day(Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital), Theresa Hayes(West Health), Sue‐Anne McLachlan(The Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital), Belinda Lee(Northern Health), Janine Ptak(Howard Hughes Medical Institute), Natalie Silliman(Howard Hughes Medical Institute), Lisa Dobbyn(Cancer Research Center), Maria Popoli(Cancer Research Center), Ralph H. Hruban(Cancer Research Center), Anne Marie Lennon(Cancer Research Center), Nicholas Papadopoulos(Cancer Research Center), Kenneth W. Kinzler(Cancer Research Center), Bert Vogelstein(Howard Hughes Medical Institute), Cristian Tomasetti(Johns Hopkins University), Peter Gibbs(The University of Melbourne)
New England Journal of Medicine
June 4, 2022
Cited by 956Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer continues to be debated. The presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) after surgery predicts very poor recurrence-free survival, whereas its absence predicts a low risk of recurrence. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for ctDNA-positive patients is not well understood. METHODS: We conducted a trial to assess whether a ctDNA-guided approach could reduce the use of adjuvant chemotherapy without compromising recurrence risk. Patients with stage II colon cancer were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to have treatment decisions guided by either ctDNA results or standard clinicopathological features. For ctDNA-guided management, a ctDNA-positive result at 4 or 7 weeks after surgery prompted oxaliplatin-based or fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy. Patients who were ctDNA-negative were not treated. The primary efficacy end point was recurrence-free survival at 2 years. A key secondary end point was adjuvant chemotherapy use. RESULTS: Of the 455 patients who underwent randomization, 302 were assigned to ctDNA-guided management and 153 to standard management. The median follow-up was 37 months. A lower percentage of patients in the ctDNA-guided group than in the standard-management group received adjuvant chemotherapy (15% vs. 28%; relative risk, 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25 to 2.65). In the evaluation of 2-year recurrence-free survival, ctDNA-guided management was noninferior to standard management (93.5% and 92.4%, respectively; absolute difference, 1.1 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.1 to 6.2 [noninferiority margin, -8.5 percentage points]). Three-year recurrence-free survival was 86.4% among ctDNA-positive patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy and 92.5% among ctDNA-negative patients who did not. CONCLUSIONS: A ctDNA-guided approach to the treatment of stage II colon cancer reduced adjuvant chemotherapy use without compromising recurrence-free survival. (Supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council and others; DYNAMIC Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12615000381583.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis