Durvalumab plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

Do‐Youn Oh(Seoul National University Hospital), Aiwu Ruth He(Georgetown University), Shukui Qin(Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command), Li‐Tzong Chen(Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital), Takuji Okusaka, Arndt Vogel(Medizinische Hochschule Hannover), Jin Won Kim(Seoul National University Bundang Hospital), Thatthan Suksombooncharoen(Chiang Mai University), Myung Ah Lee(The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital), Masayuki Kitano(Wakayama Medical University), Howard A. Burris(Tennessee Oncology), Mohamed Bouattour(Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris), Suebpong Tanasanvimon(King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital), Mairéad G. McNamara(University of Manchester), Renata Zaucha(Gdańsk Medical University), Antonio Avallone(Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale"), Benjamin Tan(Washington University in St. Louis), Juan Cundom(Instituto de Diagnóstico e Investigaciones Metabólicas), Choong‐kun Lee(Yonsei University), Hidenori Takahashi(Osaka International Cancer Institute), Masafumi Ikeda(National Cancer Center Hospital East), Jen‐Shi Chen(Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital), Julie Wang(AstraZeneca (Japan)), Mallory Makowsky(AstraZeneca (Japan)), Nana Rokutanda(AstraZeneca (Japan)), Philip He(AstraZeneca (Japan)), John F. Kurland(AstraZeneca (Japan)), Gordon Cohen(AstraZeneca (Japan)), Juan W. Valle(University of Manchester)
NEJM Evidence
June 1, 2022
Cited by 1,069

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced biliary tract cancer have a poor prognosis, and first-line standard of care (gemcitabine plus cisplatin) has remained unchanged for more than 10 years. The TOPAZ-1 trial evaluated durvalumab plus chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study, we randomly assigned patients with previously untreated unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer or with recurrent disease 1:1 to receive durvalumab or placebo in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin for up to eight cycles, followed by durvalumab or placebo monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was to assess overall survival. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, objective response rate, and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 685 patients were randomly assigned to durvalumab (n=341) or placebo (n=344) with chemotherapy. As of data cutoff, 198 patients (58.1%) in the durvalumab group and 226 patients (65.7%) in the placebo group had died. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.97; P=0.021). The estimated 24-month overall survival rate was 24.9% (95% CI, 17.9 to 32.5) for durvalumab and 10.4% (95% CI, 4.7 to 18.8) for placebo. The hazard ratio for progression-free survival was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.89; P=0.001). Objective response rates were 26.7% with durvalumab and 18.7% with placebo. The incidences of grade 3 or 4 adverse events were 75.7% and 77.8% with durvalumab and placebo, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Durvalumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival versus placebo plus chemotherapy and showed improvements versus placebo plus chemotherapy in prespecified secondary end points including progression-free survival and objective response rate. The safety profiles of the two treatment groups were similar. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03875235.)


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis