Effect of Awake Prone Positioning on Endotracheal Intubation in Patients With COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Failure

Waleed Alhazzani(King Saud University), Ken Kuljit S. Parhar(Alberta Health Services), Jason Weatherald(University of Alberta), Zainab Al Duhailib(Alfaisal University), Mohammed Alshahrani(Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University), Abdulrahman Al‐Fares(Amiri Hospital), Sarah Buabbas(Al-Sabah Hospital), Sujith V. Cherian, Laveena Munshi(University Health Network), Eddy Fan(University Health Network), Fahad Al-Hameed(King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences), Jamal Chalabi(King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences), Amera A. Rahmatullah(King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre), Erick Duan(Niagara Health System), Jennifer Tsang(Niagara Health System), Kimberley Lewis(St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton), François Lauzier(Université Laval), John Centofanti(McMaster University), Bram Rochwerg(Impact), Sarah Culgin(St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton), Katlynne Nelson(St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton), Sheryl Ann Abdukahil(King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences), Kirsten M. Fiest(Alberta Health Services), Henry T. Stelfox(Alberta Health Services), Haytham Tlayjeh(King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences), Maureen O. Meade(Impact), Dan Perri(St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton), Kevin Solverson(Alberta Health Services), Daniel J. Niven(Alberta Health Services), Rachel Lim(University of Calgary), Morten Hylander Møller(Copenhagen University Hospital), Emilie P. Belley‐Côté(Population Health Research Institute), Lehana Thabane(Impact), Hani Tamim(Alfaisal University), Deborah J. Cook(Impact), Yaseen M. Arabi(King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences), COVI-PRONE Trial Investigators and the Saudi Critical Care Trials Group, Kara Nerenberg, Alexis F. Turgeon, Charles Francoeur, Guillaume Leblanc, Maude St‐Onge, Lorenzo Del Sorbo, Rosa M. Estrada‐Y‐Martin, Hala Hamada, Abdulaziz Al-Mutawa, Ardeshir Algooneh, Farhan Alenezi, Eman Al Qasim, Hussain Al Haji, Mohammad Al Mutairi, Omar Al Zumai, Amal Matroud, Musharaf Sadat, Felwa Bin Humaid, Wedyan Al Wehaibi, Faisal Al-Basseet, M Al-Obaidi, Muhammed Alshahrani(Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University), Yousef Almubarak, Laila Perlas Asonto, Charlene Mapusao, K I Gómez De La Cruz, Arivu Muthu, Shaya Y. AlQahtani, Mae Ann Santillan, Amera A. Rahmatullah(King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre), Shatha Baraja’a, Haya Al Othaimeen, Fahad Al-Hameed(King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences), Gulam Rasool, Ohoud AlOrabi, Gauhar Khan, Jamal Chalabi(King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences), Zuheb Nagoor, Ammar Alkroud, Arwa Alhussaini, Ahmad S Qureshi, Ahmad Quadri, Babar Javed, Khalid Idrees
JAMA
May 15, 2022
Cited by 156Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Importance: The efficacy and safety of prone positioning is unclear in nonintubated patients with acute hypoxemia and COVID-19. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of prone positioning in nonintubated adult patients with acute hypoxemia and COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: Pragmatic, unblinded randomized clinical trial conducted at 21 hospitals in Canada, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and the US. Eligible adult patients with COVID-19 were not intubated and required oxygen (≥40%) or noninvasive ventilation. A total of 400 patients were enrolled between May 19, 2020, and May 18, 2021, and final follow-up was completed in July 2021. Intervention: Patients were randomized to awake prone positioning (n = 205) or usual care without prone positioning (control; n = 195). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation within 30 days of randomization. The secondary outcomes included mortality at 60 days, days free from invasive mechanical ventilation or noninvasive ventilation at 30 days, days free from the intensive care unit or hospital at 60 days, adverse events, and serious adverse events. Results: Among the 400 patients who were randomized (mean age, 57.6 years [SD, 12.83 years]; 117 [29.3%] were women), all (100%) completed the trial. In the first 4 days after randomization, the median duration of prone positioning was 4.8 h/d (IQR, 1.8 to 8.0 h/d) in the awake prone positioning group vs 0 h/d (IQR, 0 to 0 h/d) in the control group. By day 30, 70 of 205 patients (34.1%) in the prone positioning group were intubated vs 79 of 195 patients (40.5%) in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.59 to 1.12], P = .20; absolute difference, -6.37% [95% CI, -15.83% to 3.10%]). Prone positioning did not significantly reduce mortality at 60 days (hazard ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.40], P = .54; absolute difference, -1.15% [95% CI, -9.40% to 7.10%]) and had no significant effect on days free from invasive mechanical ventilation or noninvasive ventilation at 30 days or on days free from the intensive care unit or hospital at 60 days. There were no serious adverse events in either group. In the awake prone positioning group, 21 patients (10%) experienced adverse events and the most frequently reported were musculoskeletal pain or discomfort from prone positioning (13 of 205 patients [6.34%]) and desaturation (2 of 205 patients [0.98%]). There were no reported adverse events in the control group. Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure from COVID-19, prone positioning, compared with usual care without prone positioning, did not significantly reduce endotracheal intubation at 30 days. However, the effect size for the primary study outcome was imprecise and does not exclude a clinically important benefit. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04350723.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis