Comparing continuous versus categorical measures to assess and benchmark intensive care unit performance
Leonardo dos Santos Lourenço Bastos(Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro), Márcio Soares(University of Copenhagen), Sílvio Hamacher(Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro), Safira A. Wortel(University of Amsterdam), Jorge I. Salluh(Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro), Ameen Abu–Hanna(GGD Amsterdam), Fernando A. Bozza(D’Or Institute for Research and Education), Dave A. Dongelmans(Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam), Fernando G. Zampieri(University of Alberta), Ferishta Bakhshi‐Raiez(Amsterdam University Medical Centers), Gastón Burghi(Hospital Maciel), Nicolette F. de Keizer(GGD Amsterdam)
Cited by 23
Related Papers
A minimal common outcome measure set for COVID-19 clinical research
|The Lancet Infectious Diseases|2020|1.8k
Platelet activation and platelet-monocyte aggregate formation trigger tissue factor expression in patients with severe COVID-19
|Blood|2020|776
Cytokine profiles as markers of disease severity in sepsis: a multiplex analysis
|Critical Care|2007|744
Characterisation of the first 250 000 hospital admissions for COVID-19 in Brazil: a retrospective analysis of nationwide data
|The Lancet Respiratory Medicine|2021|527
A Central Role for Free Heme in the Pathogenesis of Severe Sepsis
|Science Translational Medicine|2010|492