Elacestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) Versus Standard Endocrine Therapy for Estrogen Receptor–Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Results From the Randomized Phase III EMERALD Trial

François‐Clément Bidard(Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines), Virginia Kaklamani(The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center), Patrick Neven(Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven), Guillermo Streich, Alberto J. Montero(University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center), Frédéric Forget(Libreville Hospital), Marie‐Ange Mouret‐Reynier(Centre Jean Perrin), Joohyuk Sohn(Yonsei University Health System), Donatienne Taylor(UCLouvain), Kathleen Harnden(Virginia Cancer Institute), Hung T. Khong(Moffitt Cancer Center), Judit Kocsis(Bács-Kiskun Megyei Kórház), Florence Dalenc(Institut Claudius Regaud), Patrick M. Dillon(University of Virginia Cancer Center), Sunil Babu(Fort Wayne Medical Institute), Simon Waters(Velindre Cancer Centre), Ines Deleu(Vlaamse Vereniging voor Obstetrie en Gynaecolo), José Á. García-Sáenz(Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Emilio Bria(Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Marina Elena Cazzaniga(Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo), Janice Lu(University of Southern California), Philippe Aftimos(Université Libre de Bruxelles), Javier Cortés(MedSIR (Spain)), Shubin Liu(Cytel (United States)), Giulia Tonini(Menarini Group (Italy)), Dirk Laurent(Menarini Group (Germany)), Nassir Habboubi, Maureen G. Conlan(Radius Health (United States)), Aditya Bardia(Harvard University)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
May 18, 2022
Cited by 684Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE Patients with pretreated estrogen receptor (ER)–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative advanced breast cancer have poor prognosis. Elacestrant is a novel, oral selective ER degrader that demonstrated activity in early studies. METHODS This randomized, open-label, phase III trial enrolled patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had one-two lines of endocrine therapy, required pretreatment with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, and ≤ 1 chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to elacestrant 400 mg orally once daily or standard-of-care (SOC) endocrine monotherapy. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review in all patients and patients with detectable ESR1 mutations. RESULTS Patients were randomly assigned to elacestrant (n = 239) or SOC (n = 238). ESR1 mutation was detected in 47.8% of patients, and 43.4% received two prior endocrine therapies. PFS was prolonged in all patients (hazard ratio = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.88; P = .002) and patients with ESR1 mutation (hazard ratio = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77; P = .0005). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 7.2% receiving elacestrant and 3.1% receiving SOC. Treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment discontinuations were 3.4% in the elacestrant arm versus 0.9% in SOC. Nausea of any grade occurred in 35.0% receiving elacestrant and 18.8% receiving SOC (grade 3/4, 2.5% and 0.9%, respectively). CONCLUSION Elacestrant is the first oral selective ER degrader demonstrating a significant PFS improvement versus SOC both in the overall population and in patients with ESR1 mutations with manageable safety in a phase III trial for patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis